After all Bush was elected twice to the Presidency. And the best their candidates managed to do is come in second. What does it say about a Party that can't manage to outsmart an idiot?
2007-02-24 03:45:38 · 11 answers · asked by namsaev 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
That's why ya gotta love the liberals, they are a laugh riot! Who else would go on national TV and say that they were duped by an(they claim) idiot. I think it's hilarious to read some of the questions that, on one hand he is a complete moron who couldn't feed himself practically, and on the other say he is the mastermind behind some pretty crazy conspiracy theories. Oh the joy!! Rave on you crazy liberals, rave on! I also find the fact that they don't like being called liberal anymore either. funny too. It has a bad connotation, you know. Being weak on defense and strong on......well.....weakness. Have a good day and stay out of trouble.
2007-02-24 03:56:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This says that there are a limited amount of smart people in the US, as we see because Bush was elected twice. I think a major problem is that the Majority of the Unite States population is undereducated and do not quite grasp the concepts that this country is currently going through.
The people who oppose Bush are the few that see what is going wrong in this country. Great minds think alike, sadly there are few.
I hope this country will see the mistakes and try hard to make up for the mistakes.
2007-02-24 04:02:38 · answer #2 · answered by Carina G 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
initially, liberals do not declare that Bush planned the 9/11 assaults. Nutjobs declare that. a super sort of a similar nutjobs who insist that Obama replace into born in Kenya. As on your question: Bush is a moron and no-one claims he's an evil genius. That call is going to Dick Cheney, who stood being the curtain pulling the levers like a marionette.
2016-10-16 09:39:49 · answer #3 · answered by thedford 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That they outsmarted themselves twice in the last 8 years.
That they chose people they felt were smart as their candidate instead of people who were in touch with what people in the middle of America think and feel.
2007-02-24 03:49:57 · answer #4 · answered by Vultureman 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That there are more idiots and religious fanatics in this country that worship Bush than there are intelligent voters.
I'm glad Hillary Clinton never ran a stop sign and killed anyone.
2007-02-24 03:48:39 · answer #5 · answered by Dana Katherine 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
" IF as liberals say Bush is an idiot and they are right. What does that say about them? "
well it doesn't say much for them because EVERYONE knows Bush is an idiot !
they make themselves look stupid for stating the obvious.
2007-02-24 03:51:56 · answer #6 · answered by Jester 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lots of people are idiots, and they'd like to have an idiot to represent them.
And the idiot has a very sophisticated propaganda machine behind him.
2007-02-24 03:48:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Dana Katherine,you'd just vote for a guy (over and over)who left a woman to drown.
2007-02-24 04:13:09 · answer #8 · answered by Nikki 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It says mainly that idiocy doesn't hurt your presidential aspirations if you have a sufficiently cynical and manipulative campaign behind you. That's about it.
2007-02-24 04:22:54 · answer #9 · answered by bdunn91 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOL Great point!
They will just tell you he stole the elections
2007-02-24 03:49:22 · answer #10 · answered by BAARAAACK 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋