She is trying to get to any money/property Anna may have in her estate. It starts w/custody of the body & moves from there.
2007-02-24 03:06:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Taffy Saltwater 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
She's definitely pulling an act for her supposed daughter. They didn't even have a strong relationship, and it wasn't Anna Nicole's fault. I don't think so, no. Vergie Arthur can't just say, "I want my wonderful little girl buried in Texas, since that's where the family plot is, and it would be best." Woman, we don't need your feedback, this is a serious case and not just for tears, so get out of this. I'm telling you, I don't like Ms. Arthur, she never cared for Anna Nicole, if she did, she would put a permanent end to Anna Nicole's drug-indulgement, and she didn't do so, which proves her to be uncaring and unimportant in this case. Larry and Howard were the men in Anna Nicole's lives who cared for her, equally, and willed and tried her to discontinue her drugs. It obviously didn't work, as, she died. But, she was so young and for that fact, it's so controversial that she died, almost as if a planned death!
2007-02-24 03:13:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by sPrInG LiLY 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Her mother is a low life hick.
Not to say that Anna Nicole was wonderful or anything but her mom. I even have a bad feeling about.
and Howard K Stern is not great either. this whole situation is bad, and no one is good in it
2007-02-24 03:00:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Laura M 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
she will sue for regardless of she needs, as long as she has presented precise suggestion, which she in all possibility will do. i do no longer understand concerning to the clown face video with Anna Nicole Smith, in spite of the undeniable fact that it could have pop out earlier she had died, long earlier. If it incredibly is pop out at the instant, then perhaps her death has tousled Howard ok. Stern's recommendations lots that he's began doing loopy issues. with a bit of luck he will recuperate quickly adequate, he's one among those candy guy!
2016-12-14 04:39:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by killeen 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, if she proffited anything off of her grandson's death, why wouldn't she proffit anything off of her daughters death! Just because she is the mother, doesnt mean she is right.
2007-02-24 10:20:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by tatugrl78 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
YES...
.but it's not her fault she will be profiting off her dead daughters life style....and the MESS she left.
me.... I would have told that idiot attorney for H.S the TRUTH..
I would never have let her intimidate me...
Virgie should have said this....
I will take all the money offered to me to be able to look you in the eyes tell you ... the money is only to get MY dead daughter home...HOME.
Then I would need more money to have my grandson exhumed from {where Anna put him in her drugged up state of mind and influenced by evil Howard}
.and then bury him next to her....at HOME.
2007-02-24 03:44:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Bobbie4u 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
uh....hello....of course she is. You never hear **** from her mother until all of this comes up. Everyone new that her and Anna Nicole hated each other. Her mom is keeping and milking every penny for her daughters worth that she can.
2007-02-24 03:26:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kendra 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
she will be selling her story or any videos she has or pics,she just wants to get her last dig into Anna Nicole because Anna is dead now and fight back.
2007-02-24 05:10:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by luv babygurl 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Of course she is. She wants what your daughter had..she was jealous and she is getting old for all the TV interviews.
2007-02-24 03:04:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by wyattj23 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes I do. She didn't seem to care about her daughter when she was alive,now all of a sudden she is interested, there has to be a reason and it is probably money.
2007-02-24 03:17:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Urchin 6
·
0⤊
1⤋