English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

Who says that we aren't focusing on Bin Laden too. Hate to say this, but your argument has all the logic of saying we weren't focusing on Japan by going after Hitler. After all Hitler didn't attack us on Dec 7, 1941. Hitler wasn't an immanent threat.

Get real.

2007-02-24 02:34:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If Osama is indeed still alive, he is most certainly holed up somewhere in a cave wondering if the events of 9/11 was a very intelligent move.
His dreams of a world wide jihad have been crushed and his tactics of terror and murder have resulted in the vast majority of his alQaeda leadership killed or captured, Iraq is well on its way to becoming a democracy and, instead of killing the infidels, his once well oiled and organized insurgency has been reduced to infighting among the different sects within his own people.
I suspect the victims and families are pleased that we finally responded after all of the pain and misery these dirt bags have inflicted on innocent people throughout the world.

2007-02-24 10:49:10 · answer #2 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 0 0

How Many Libs Understand that we Did not go to Iraq Because of 9/11? Iraq Attacked Our Jets in the No FlyZone
We had a bunch of UN resolutions that forced the situation and we did not act Unilatterally. Our Jets were attacked in the UN mandated "No Fly Zone" We Know it was not because of 9/11 and WMDs was a SMALL part of the reason. Protection of the Kurds ( like when Clinton went to protect the Bosnians) was a large part of it as the UN tends to look down on ethnic Cleansing. So Please stop posting the BS that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 WE KNOW ALREADY!
Please read the UN resolutions as they were the Legal method of attack everything else was just speeches. Your limited understanding of the GAME does not mean the goals were moved. You have to read all of it not just want you want. Ignorance of the LAW is no excuse.

Were the families of Pearl Harbor victims happy that we attacked in europe first? and Hitler not Tojo

2007-02-24 10:34:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

They support Bush in majority. Yes. We are pursuing Osama and fighting his trainees in Iraq.

2007-02-24 10:31:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

And what makes you think we are not looking to put two in the turban for Osama?

2007-02-24 10:33:50 · answer #5 · answered by Boston Mark 5 · 0 0

Osama is dead and has been sense Torra Borra. There hasn't been a new picture taken of him sense. They've tried to fake his voice but it doesn't work. Only the people who are easily convinced believe he's alive.

2007-02-24 10:32:53 · answer #6 · answered by Kevin A 6 · 0 1

When was the last time you saw Osama?

2007-02-24 10:30:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Don't act like you know what this is about.The families do,guess you cant understand the concept of when the President said we are going after the terrorists and those who harbor and finance them,but your boots aren't on the ground and you obviously arent aware of proof our troops found of Sadam financing them and also providing training camps.Lets see isnt that harboring and financing?Darrrrrr

You need to quit giving your liberal professor BJ's.

2007-02-24 10:35:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

The families of 9/11 want closure & they want peace

2007-02-24 10:32:30 · answer #9 · answered by hobo 7 · 0 0

Their are alot of a**es to woop on and we have to kick them as we find them...these countries are hidding these monsters so its just a matter of time before all of the terrorist that oppose us will fall.

2007-02-24 10:31:50 · answer #10 · answered by Spades Of Columbia 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers