It's a question that needs to be asked.
2007-02-24 02:06:22 · 17 answers · asked by Villain 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Actually....I like France. Could the USA beat them if we had too?
2007-02-24 02:10:44 · update #1
Bad Seed....that is funny!
2007-02-24 02:11:17 · update #2
Control Bagdad?
We can't even control the road betwen Bagdad and the airport!
2007-02-24 02:09:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
If the King is bad and he wants to take your life you have got every
right to ask for foreign powers to destabilise the situation to save
your life. But if you are minuscule minority then foreign forces will
not be successful.
In IRAQ Saddam may be bad but Iraqis do not want Americans.
Because the PEOPLE are not cooperating that is why USA cannot
take control of Baghdad.
Similarly if PEOPLE of China,Iran or France do not cooperate
then USA cannot defeat them.Now a days nobody want to conquer a country,they want a pliable govt. of their own people
who will do everything at their bidding.
2007-02-24 02:39:52 · answer #2 · answered by samiran_bandyopadhyay 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
For the US to defeat any of these countries except France it would require the use of nuclear weapons I suppose there folks ingovernment & the counttry who would agree with this We could probably take France alone but not the whole of Europe Why? Does the US have plans on conquering the world?
2007-02-24 02:19:41 · answer #3 · answered by hobo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your questions are so foolish and you side with any group over the US...We have no reason to go to war with China..and that war would end life as we know it...it would be full Nukes on.
France has a SURRENDER AT ALL COSTS policy just like you libbies so they would not be a problem...but I wouldn't want the responsibility of looking after those people...
NOW as far as Iran goes...you were saying and your friends as well, how we could not beat there army...just like how powerful the Iraq army was....They don't cut and run....THEY RUN...the US military will roll across their country in a matter of weeks...the occupation is a different thing...we should go in destroy the Nuke infrastructure and get out...
OR BETTER
No troops just heavy bombers and a few mega-tons of warheads
BOOM
WE WIN
2007-02-24 03:36:08 · answer #4 · answered by Real Estate Para Legal 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
We have amazing missile capabilities and we DO have more nukes than anyone else. I'd say we can defeat them but let's not try in the near future...
I feel this war is just and we need to fight it and WIN...the terrorists think we are weak so we need to win to send them a message.
I don't like war and wish everyone could get along...but that's not gonna happen!
2007-02-24 03:03:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ahhh...Best joke..:-)))).....May be China will control USA.....Baghdad is came controled by islamic radicals wich was occupate Iraq after day of USA-Iraq war....Womens were study in Saddam Iraq,but now they cant so....World terror was born after desant of americans to Iraq
2007-02-24 02:41:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no reason to attack China and no reason, as of yet, to make any move on Iran.
As for your comment, Information Police, RTE Irish is one of the more secure routes in Baghdad.
We're on it all the time.
2007-02-24 02:14:31 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
We would have to borrow money from China to go to war aganist them
I sure hope the chinese let whitey have casinos
2007-02-24 02:14:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
If there weren't so many bleeding hearts we would already control France, Iran, and Iraq.
2007-02-24 02:10:56 · answer #9 · answered by Abu 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Not with Bush at the helm.
But if he weren't there we wouldn't need to either...
2007-02-24 02:15:37 · answer #10 · answered by na n 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋