has anyone seen the issue of times with the afgani guy on it thats messed up old george doesnt want to win the war against terrorist he had a hell fo an ally but flushed him down the drug war toilet read time magazine feb 19 2007 another bush folly has stopped a chance for peace in afganistan tripled the poppy production. its always 1 step foward 2 steps back for this government
2007-02-24 00:27:27 · 10 answers · asked by mark s 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
sorry i just have to ask how in the f is the war on drugs a war on terror besides bush says so? can americans(im one) be so ignorant as to really think a man smoking pot is helping the taliban? george bush again has aided the terrorist atleast thats what time magazine says enjoy your ignorance. as for my spelling get a grip man its just an easy way for you to avoid the truth its not as if you couldnt understand
2007-02-24 03:26:23 · update #1
stopping terrorists is more important.. people make the choice to use drugs.. nobody chooses to be blown up by terrorists..
2007-02-24 00:29:17 · answer #1 · answered by Byakuya 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The answer is they go hand in hand. This country has the ability to do both. So far we seam to be doing a better job of keeping us safe from the terrorist. If we apply the same effort to drugs we could win that war to!
2007-02-24 00:35:16 · answer #2 · answered by Boston Mark 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Both because the two go hand-in-hand.
A great deal of drug money goes into funding terrorists groups. IE, Afghanistan and it's poppi fields.
So, since both have ties to each other, if you can win the drug war, you will be simultaneously fighting terrorism.
2007-02-24 07:10:55 · answer #3 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Get a grip. Do you actually think that the war on illegal drugs is winnable? As long as there is a demand there will be a supply. By the way, haven't you ever heard of a period? I'm sure you know they exist. Try using one once in a while.
2007-02-24 01:54:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Stopping drug use and terrorism are both important for the country to have peace and order in the society.
2007-02-24 00:31:25 · answer #5 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
There is NO war on drugs.
And, if some get 'their' way, there wont be a WAR on Terrorism.
We'll have make believe War on Drugs....(as we do now)
And we'll have "Let's all be friends, what do you want from me...tee hee"
And then, The Terrorist will tell us what they want and how bad we are and we will comply with them and all will be well.***
***Taken from the Happy Hollywood Manifesto.
2007-02-24 00:34:47 · answer #6 · answered by ignuusfatuus 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
War on drug is more important because terrorism is drug related.
2007-02-24 00:32:10 · answer #7 · answered by wilma m 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
They are both important and they are both being worked. We are very good at doing more than two things at once. Do you still have a problem with that?
2007-02-24 00:36:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I agree with the first answer...and terrorists do not discriminate against drug users either !!...........
2007-02-24 00:31:24 · answer #9 · answered by ozzy chik... 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Welcome to America! Please learn the language.
2007-02-24 00:30:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋