Controlled demolition!!! They find it hard to see it as truth because theyre afraid to face it so they reject it and make you feel like a nut when you see the obvious.
Its called a state of justified denial...
2007-02-23 19:44:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by sadeyzluv 4
·
1⤊
7⤋
I pretty much hate Bush too but I'm not a nutjob. One, they didn't collapse in a neat pile...LOOK AT THE FOOTAGE AGAIN. See the planes fly in and practically come out the other side? It wasn't simply melting...the structural integrity was gone. I know it's hard to believe that a huge jet traveling at 500 mph could do this, but steel is not indestructible. So, explosives were pre-planted in the building? How'd they get all the people who got out to cover up the explosions? Where's the evidence of these explosions, visual or otherwise? Funny, it didn't look or sound anything like an intentional demolition of a building with the multiple explosions that are always involved. Why are so many people not accepting your whack-job theories? BECAUSE THERE'S NO EVIDENCE TO BACK THEM UP. Get a life. "Case closed"!
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
2007-02-23 19:55:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Fireant3 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
Wait, so you are saying that explosives were detonated IN ORDER TO create a neat pile? Sorry, but that is ridiculous. If explosives were set off, there would have been rubble many blocks away.
So...2 large aircraft sit in the towers for 45 minutes and spill thousands of gallons of extremely hot jet fuel, melt steel girders and beams, and damage the structural integrity of the towers just from the impact of the crashes, you are saying you are SURPRISED that there weren't pieces scattered everywhere?
You must have failed physics. It's called GRAVITY. Unless another force acted on the towers, there is nowhere else to go but straight down.
Lay off the weed.
Please.
2007-02-23 20:23:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by drbuns 5
·
4⤊
1⤋
yep, precisely, some actually everyone looks too blind and ignorant to make sure it, did you spot the video observed as loose substitute? It shows how the residing house windows were blowing out on the diverse flooring earlier the fireplace even were given to them, and how human beings said they kept listening to louds bangs like bombs going off. It also talks about how the planes ought to no longer have in simple terms disenigrated at the same time as it supposedly hit the Pentagon, the in effortless words element that ought to've performed that type of harm is an missle from the US military..also actually everyone looks blind to many different information like that they had evacutions of the dual towers on quite a few events for no reason previous the incident, and how all different flights for that day were cancelled, and how politicians were warned no longer to fly that day, and how human beings were making cellular telephone calls from the plane...at the same time as cellphones ought to no longer get an illustration at that genuine in 2001 and how some guy supposedly observed as his mom yet kept repeating his first and extremely last call to her. there are way too many inconsistancies to even trust that it became the artwork of terrorists in effortless words, there had to be authorities officials in touch. I discovered that there turned right into a gaggle of gold bars that became there that they were after. yet besides, i'm able to pass on and on about each little thing i realized and comprehend now,yet do not wanna make this too lengthy Oh and also i wanted to communicate about the way it takes different construction of that length days to burn and nevertheless the metal reinforcements do not fall really ordinary, the dual towers fell in a jiffy and individuals can not see some thing incorrect with that?
2016-12-04 21:18:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You call that a "neat pile"? The periodic table of elements doesn't give the melting temps for metals, only their atomic number. The buildings weren't supported with pure iron, engineers haven't been that stupid for over a century, and the fires that softened those supports burned for hours before the buildings collapsed. Get a new conspiracy and parade it somewhere besides here.
2007-02-23 20:23:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by desiderio 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
And the saddest thing of all is that people actually believe this conspiracy theory. Just like the theory that there were bombs strategically placed at the Federal Building in Oklahoma City.
And Pearl Harbor was completely orchestrated by FDR.
Why is it that those who seem to be the most intelligent will grab on to the lamest story just because they are afraid that believing what the government says means you are ignorant.
Sometimes reality is just that reality. Terrorists flew a plane into 3 buildings that morning and attempted 1 other. They killed thousands of people, destroyed all of those families. They did it not because they were paid by our government but because they hate our government.
2007-02-23 19:47:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by picture . . . perfect 2
·
4⤊
1⤋
Your ignorance shines through this "question".
Have you ever been to the World Trade Center after 9/11? Obviously not. I have and it a horrible nasty site. There is rubble everywhere. Even the picture on TV show rubble everywhere.
Your statement is so illogical. Where did you pull your facts out of?
Your husband in Iraq must be so proud of you. He is there fighting and you are on the internet all day long spewing garbage. Seriously, you and all of your personalities need to get a different hobby. Try knitting, it is quite therapeutic.
2007-02-24 11:57:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes they were pre-planted alright. I see also that It's impossible for Jet fuel or Kerosene to melt iron.
2007-02-23 21:24:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
I am getting tired of reading the garbage you post. Nothing you say is true.
2007-02-23 19:39:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by redneckking_99 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
You people are all whack jobs
2007-02-23 19:39:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by JOHN D 6
·
3⤊
1⤋