Catholics believe that the Church is divinely protected from error. That whole "infallibility" thing isn't really a cherry-pick - they have a specific set of circumstances in which it applies, and it's pretty limited. I don't accept it myself, but it's not stupid (I mean, the Jesuits accept it, for Heaven's sake) and it's not "satanic".
2007-02-23 18:54:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Anyone who accepts the fact that the old testament prophets, the old testament high priests, the writers of the old testament, and the writers of the new testament, could act infallibly when under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, should have no trouble with the leader of the universal, new covenant Christian church doing the same thing.
Jesus remains the head of the Catholic Church, with the Holy Spirit as the constant arbiter of divine truth, and the Pope answers directly to God.
The Catholic Church has maintained one consistent creed for around 2000 years now, as opposed to the relatively recent protestant groups, whose various creeds now exceed some 31,000.
Do the math for yourself, and you'll see that God is the one who's really behind "the whole pope thing". He always was.
2007-02-23 22:55:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
would not make him holier then thou the pope is the chief of the Catholic denomination. while the CME, AME, COGIC and one among those Baptist denominations (southern, missionary, first) they have a similar style of "chief" even nonetheless it rather is a President. there is likewise the Archbishop of Canterbury. the pope is only extra widely time-commemorated and has a bigger congregation. on a similar time as he entered the international a similar way - might you be prepared to provide up all fabric possessions? stay your existence below the microscope of the media? provide up all family individuals and time with them different than for maybe as quickly as a year? have a uncommon handful of human beings you could have faith? on no account rather have any time for relax & rest? attempt to disspell the myths that are blatantly swirling approximately you and the Catholic faith? commit your existence totally & fully to God on my own? EDIT - in case you study in Acts 6 you will see that - there is apostolic succession and there might have been so lots extra if somebody became diligent adequate to maintain it going.
2016-11-25 20:25:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by shepardson 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No they're not following Satan. I don't ge the whole Pope thing either, but I am amazed at how faithful so many of my Catholic friends are. In the face of criticism, priest scandals etc... they remain faithful to our Father in Heaven and strive to do good things for others. I think they are amazing - even though I don't get the whole Pope thing.
2007-02-23 18:55:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by rndyh77 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's all true, but you are forgetting another problem: Protestants. They have some messed up leaders, like John Calvin. Did you know that Calvin had several people burned at the stake (historical evidence) when they deviated from his teachings?
2007-02-23 18:56:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jesus entrusting the care and feeding of His sheep to the Apostle Peter: John 21:15-17
Apostolic succession: Acts 1:15-26
2007-02-23 19:03:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
It says in the Bible that there will be many false prophets who will decieve many people. I believe that catholicism is one of the most popular of all these. Any church, leader, doctrine or person that preaches in the name of God, but takes away from the word or adds to the word,; falls into the catagory of false prophet. If you want to know the truth, read the Bible for you own self. God is speaking to you- not someone else to intepret for you. It is very wise to question every person who claims to bring you the word of God. What they say should be in direct alignment with the scripture. If it is not, then dont believe it.
2007-02-23 19:00:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Erin 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
As a matter of fact, YES, they are.
I apologize to any devoted Catholics who read this. Having been brought up Catholic, I know the reverence felt towards the Pontiff. However, ignorance is not bliss and backfires eventually.
There is in Europe, a group called the Black Nobility. This title comes from their ruthless lack of scruple. Over the centuries, they have employed murder, rape, kidnapping, assassination, robbery, slander, and all manner of deceit on a grand scale, brooking no opposition to attaining their objectives. These have immense wealth. And money is power. They have infiltrated almost every political body on the planet. They have an agenda to bring about the NWO, also known as the Fourth Reich.
The most powerful of the Black Nobility families are located in Italy, Germany, Switzerland, Britain, Holland and Greece in that order. Their roots may be traced back to the Venetian oligarchs, who are of Khazar extraction, and married into these royal houses in the early part of the twelfth century. Following a great Khazar victory over the Arabs, the future Emperor, Constantine V, married a Khazar princess and their son became Emperor Leo IV, also known as "Leo the Khazar". The Medici popes and Pius XII Eugenio Pacelli were Khazars, as was Pope, John Paul II. Not all Black Nobility are royal houses, and many of the royal families no longer have kingdoms.
The notion of papal infallibility did not come about until near the end of the 11th century. It was solidified in the pontificate of Gregory VII and took firm hold in Catholic theology during the Counter-Reformation period. It was solemnly proclaimed as a dogma of faith in 1870 by Vatican I. This gave the pope even greater power in the world.
Gregory XVI conferred a Papal decoration on Kalman Rothschild for loaning the Vatican five million pounds in a period of difficulty. Since then the Rothschilds have been the fiscal agents of the Vatican, an extremely profitable venture for both parties. With Vatican interests at heart, the Rothschilds extended their financial and political dominion in the United States.
The Black Nobility belongs to the "Committee of 300" that controls the UN. Yes, kiddies, the United Nations. Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands has the power to veto the Vatican's choice of any pope it selects. This may explain the untimely end to Pope John Paul I's 33-day pontificate. The Prince has veto power because his family, the Habsburgs, is descended directly from the last Roman emperor. The Habsburg Frederick III was the last emperor to be crowned in Rome; his great-grandson Charles V was the last to be crowned by a pope. This is the civil equivalent of the Pope's claimed "apostolic succession" from Saint Peter.
Prince Bernhard is leader of the Black Families and also claims descent from the House of David through the Merovingian dynasty, a claim that was acknowledged to be valid by the Carolingian dynasty that supplanted them, by other monarchs and by the Roman Church of that time. Thus he can truly say that he is "related to Jesus". In other words, one of the most evil men on the planet claims lineage to Christ, legitimately.
Assisted by the CIA, Prince Bernhard has brought the hidden ruling body of the Illuminati into public knowledge as De Bilderberg Group. At the heart of the Bilderberg Group are 39 members of the Illuminati chosen from three committees drawn from the members of all the secret groups that comprise the Illuminati: the Freemasons, the Vatican and the Black Nobility. This committee works year round in offices in Switzerland.
In the book, ‘Hitler's Pope’, John Cornwall's chronicles the life of Eugenio Pacelli, Pope Pius XII. Pacellli was the most dangerous churchman in modern history. As Pontiff during World War II, not only did he fail to speak out against Hitler's Final Solution, but he personally made the Final Solution possible!
In the first decade of the twentieth century, Pacelli was a brilliant Vatican lawyer who helped shape a new ideology of unprecedented papal power. As papal nuncio in Munich and Berlin in the 1920's, he used cunning and moral blackmail to impose Rome's power on Germany. In 1933, he negotiated a treaty with Hitler, the Reich Concordat, which ensured that the Nazis could rise unopposed by the most powerful Catholic community in the world- sealing, by Hitler's own admission, the fate of the Jews in Europe. What a guy! What a good Catholic!
How could Eugenio Pacelli possibly have gotten away with such cunning, especially since we know that he was in personal contact with the Rothschilds? Guy de Rothschild was his pen pal eight years before he became Pope. But wait... if Pacelli was Hitler's Pope, and Hitler was a Rothschild... then he was Rothschild's Pope! How did Eugenio Pacelli become Rothschild's Pope?
Eugenio Pacelli was described routinely, during his pontificate and after his death, as a member of the Black Nobility. This small group consisted of aristocratic families of Rome who had stood by the popes following the seizure of their dominions in the bitter struggle for the creation of the nation-state of Italy... Pacelli's father and grandfather before him owed their distinction to membership of the caste of lay Vatican lawyers in the service of the papacy.
The Rothschild-Vatican cabal unsuccessfully attempted to gain control over the power of the purse in the US through the First and Second Bank of the United States. They were established under emergency powers granted to the President by the Constitution, as temporary institutions to tide the country through the periods of financial stress occasioned by the Revolutionary and 1812 Wars. But the aims of the conspirators to establish a banking monopoly were thwarted by the Constitution. Until the FED.
Have I said enough? Have you got the picture? The Vatican is intimately tied in the elite who attempt to turn our world into the Fourth Reich. For the past millennia they have been shaping Catholicism towards that end.
The Illuminati make the most of their money from is slave traffic, child prostitution, drugs and arms dealing. What belongs to them belongs to their partner, the Vatican. You be the judge. Does the pope serve God or does he serve his family’s interests first, disguising any conflict as being “infallible”?
I would say he serves Satan.
2007-02-23 19:06:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Noor al Haqiqa 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Look at this!
2007-02-23 19:01:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋