English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-23 17:08:32 · 13 answers · asked by Mr. CoCo 3 in Family & Relationships Singles & Dating

13 answers

Be loved...I've never been. I've loved a few who have never been honest about loving me back and it hurts too much.

2007-02-23 17:15:54 · answer #1 · answered by aweety69 4 · 1 0

Either both or neither at all... There is no compromise. It's too painful to love someone and them not love you back. And for someone to love you when you don't love them causes all sorts of trouble.

2007-02-24 01:16:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

actually i would rather love cause you know its the right person and you know in your heart that it is love now if your loved by someone then you might now like them you know so its better to love than be loved
Love, Casey

2007-02-24 01:14:58 · answer #3 · answered by ҉Single Chick~a~Dee҉ 2 · 0 1

i would rather be loved.

2007-02-24 01:16:29 · answer #4 · answered by luckystar 6 · 0 0

I don't think it's possible to want to be loved without loving the one you want to love you.

It is possible to love without being loved in retrun however.

2007-02-24 01:17:36 · answer #5 · answered by johnnyelectric 2 · 1 0

be loved

2007-02-24 01:11:43 · answer #6 · answered by latina_girl 2 · 0 0

id rather to love...

2007-02-24 01:17:38 · answer #7 · answered by melissa endrei a 1 · 0 0

no such thing.

love is a mutual love - when talking about a relationship. one might love the other more than the other though.

when its a one way love, it is obsession.

2007-02-24 01:10:46 · answer #8 · answered by John Becker 5 · 0 1

im italian i have a loving soul

2007-02-24 01:20:30 · answer #9 · answered by JeNnJeNn 1 · 0 0

Both. It should be a win win situation.

2007-02-24 01:11:50 · answer #10 · answered by bluegirl5 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers