TV show: Are you your own twin?
Two women were tested and found not a match for their children's DNA. The husbands could testify that they were in the room when the children were delivered.
The women were found, after much time & tests, to be carrying 2 different DNA. They were diognosed as having a vanishing twin.
It's called the vanishing twin. One twin is obsorbed by the other very, very, very early in the pregnancy. This was not discovered until ultrasounds could show two then suddenly only one fetus.
2007-02-23 16:20:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by maj 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If there are twins or siblings involved, sometimes there will be a '75 percent chance' that the person is the parent. This could either mean that, yes you are the parent and the sample wasn't the best, or one of your relatives is the father of your child..
Actually, from what I've heard, a 99.9 percent accurate test result is rare. This is coming from a good friend of mine who is a lab tech, specializing in DNA procedures.
2007-02-23 16:16:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by TiGeR 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your unfavorable baby. i wish that try became into incorrect. you haven't any longer reported if this woman is your spouse. Is she no longer your spouse? If she's no longer, then you definately could desire to kick her to the decrease ASAP. And if she is, then i'm sorry notwithstanding curiously like your marriage is doomed. Being inebriated would not excuse cheating. Alcohol makes you act stupid, notwithstanding it would not tension you to have intercourse with random people. She became into nonetheless on top of problems with herself. I basically could say it....shame on her for no longer getting that infant examined quicker! If she'd had a single, solitary doubt in her recommendations which you have been the father - and that i do no longer supply a crap what she says, she DID have a doubt - then she could are turning out to be that youngster examined as quickly as she became into born. different than for all the adults she's harm along with her lie, she's harm her baby the main. i wish she's pleased with herself for that - i wish she has exciting explaining to her 3 year previous that daddy isn't daddy and that some stranger is! i wish you supply her what-for roughly that, and don't flow ordinary on her the two! What a merciless, heartless woman! besides...that's a very difficult undertaking, and all the suggestion i'm able to offer is to get removed from this mendacity, manipulative witch formerly she wreaks to any extent further havoc on your existence. flow on consisting of your existence and attempt to heal; ultimately you will meet somebody greater valuable. in line with danger you may seem into getting a therapist to provide help to interior the path of the tough circumstances...i'm valuable there will be some, i won't be in a position to think of how difficult it may desire to be to advance somewhat one and think of she's yours, then discover out she's no longer. good success....wish issues get greater valuable quickly...
2016-10-01 21:45:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only if they manage to switch the person taking the test with someone else.
2007-02-23 16:14:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by notyou311 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
see DNA test never get failed but if the sample is wrong only then it can be false other wise there is no chance of it.
2007-02-23 16:15:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Gourav (HR.) 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No honey it is not possible.Someone would of had to change the swabs in the lab!!!
2007-02-23 16:16:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by skippersbrat 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
they are about 99.99% sure. MOSt of the time they dont lie.
2007-02-23 16:23:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by christina 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
they are about 99.99% sure. MOSt of the time they dont lie.
2007-02-23 16:14:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
.1% error margin..so pretty low chance.
2007-02-23 16:16:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
not likely to happen
but if someone else spit in it or tampered with it. or they switched the file, like switching babies, its not likely.
2007-02-23 16:15:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by R. M 2
·
0⤊
0⤋