Isn't it interesting how the non-believers could not answer a question about their Big Bang no god theory?

Question

.
The unanswered question posted minutes ago:

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AigJ44rYXef_9grQ8HxynR_sy6IX?qid=20070223181032AA3XnFo

Answer 1

Are you looking for an answer or an argument.....
There are many theories, many ideals and beliefs around the world. Christianity holds to the belief that God created the Universe, man and from Adam's rib, woman. Science believes in the theory of evolution, from sludge to ape to human. Metaphysics actually combines these two theories.

In the beginning there was the Great Spirit. The essence of everything in the universe. This essence wanted to expand it's self and with a little touch of the Divine energy, create a physical mass. The Great Spirit happy with what it had done, wanted to expand again. With Divine intervention, the Big Bang occurred. Galaxies were created and life formed on the planets. The evolution of spiritual beings began, but that evolution started from Divine touch and intervention.

The reason "God" is in all things, is because the Divine used a part of itself to create all things. I alone am not the Goddess, you are not the God. But you and I and all things in and around the universe, seen and unseen make up with the Divine is. We are all part of each other, connected, intertwined and alike.


so you decide....

Answer 2

heres the dumbed down version of m-theory

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/superstring...
http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/gr/publi...

check out brian green's book, "the elegant universe", especially the last couple of chapters ... on m-theory, otherwise known as 'membrane' theory, and 'string theory' ... that our universe is just one of many 'membranes' which are all expanding and contracting ... membranes which are what we would traditionally call other 'universes' or other 'dimensions', where, coincidentally, physical laws of these other universes/membranes might be very different to our physics ... this hypothesis also gives us an explanation for the cause of the so-called 'big bang' ... the membrane which is our universe began to expand in a reaction to other membranes' expansions and contractions ...i love thinking about hypotheses like this, aren't they fascinating. isn't it interesting how science works ... from 'science fiction' to hypotheses to theories, always based on evidence ... so we've got the imagination, and the observations, combined ...

and im so sorry your too impatient for me to type out the meaning of the universe for you. the universe isnt like a big baked potato, you cant just microwave your answers in 30 seconds. =p


do i have to spam you now? either you are just preaching ignorance or you simply ignore other people's ideas when they dont conform to your own. besides even if there is no answer science has the distinct ability to figure things out with evidance to back it up. at the turn of the twentieth century nobody thought man would ever fly, science accomplished it. in 1960 nobody would have believed we were going to land on the moon in less then a decade. science accomplished it. science has a very good track record here.

Answer 3

There under no circumstances replaced right into a huge bang. That replaced into in simple terms a delusion created by potential of a Belgian priest attempting to make technological know-how trust the memories in Genesis. There have under no circumstances been any gods the two. All gods are in simple terms fantasies created by potential of human imaginations. The universe has in simple terms consistently existed. It under no circumstances had a initiating. The universe is in simple terms power being switched over into count and count becoming power, endlessly.

Answer 4

More like, come up with a new and more interesting question. That's been asked a million times.

Why would I be able to answer that really? I'm just me. And if I can't I guess then your god thing is automatically the default? Sorry, that would be wrong. I'm not magic, I can't freakin tell you that, but I know it's not at all as magical as you apparently think it is.

Answer 5

No at all. You were just naive enough to pose a question about advanced physics to a group of mostly 13-16 year olds.

Of course, your question was also entirely irrelevant. If you really think you've found a 'flaw' in atheism you're even worse than the usual lot of fundies.

Answer 6

The correct answer right now is "no one knows". Religion doesn't have the answer, science doesn't have the answer, no one has the answer. It's not even widely accepted that the universe even HAD a beginning. But regardless, just because science doesn't know, it doesn't mean that God is the correct answer -- it doesn't even mean that the God answer is even somewhat likely.

Answer 7

One can only answer the same type of question so many times before it just gets plain boring. Honestly, I doubt anything I could say would even change your perspective in the slightest. I'd just be wasting my time.

Answer 8

Actually it was answered: you were and still are too impatient to wait for the answers to be typed. It cannot be explained in a few short sentences you know.

Answer 9

It is not their Theory, if I remember correctly it was a Roman Catholic that came up with it. Atheists only lack belief in God, most of us will admit we havent a clue.

Answer 10

That question gets asked again and again. Saying "we don't know yet" makes more sense to me than saying "god" did it.

Is your next question going to be "If we supposedly came from monkeys, then why are there still monkeys?"
That one always stumps us too...