2007-02-23 13:14:29 · 19 answers · asked by Rebel2 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
by reliable, I mean less insne
2007-02-24 00:49:48 · update #1
I don't see what is so bad about K-Fed...Women use famous men all the time for their money and to get famous...K-Fed was just turning things around!! He is definitely the more fit parent...but nobody knows what goes on behind closed doors
2007-02-23 14:28:42 · answer #1 · answered by hotgirl_rightgirl00 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither of them because it was clearly obvious that Britney and Kevin were an ill paired match and that Britney was desperate for attention and even if it meant getting pregnant. Britney is 25 years old and very immature because there's no reason for her leaving those babies with a nanny while she's clubbing and then saying she never had a birthday out. How many women would love to have the access to a nanny like Britney leaving her babies with someone and going on an all night party and puke binge. At some point she needed to be sat down and told that you are a parent start acting like one. Britney didnt seem like she was ready to be a mother of two at 23 years old. Kevin's no better he left two kids for the ones he's got with Britney.
I think the kids need to be with grandma while Brit gets her head together.
2007-02-23 21:29:31 · answer #2 · answered by nabdullah2001 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think neither is reliable parents... Britney party too much and she had break down and shave off her own hair.. and going into rehab.. and keep checking in and out of it...
k-fed is just like to be in spot light.. He does have 2 kids from from his exgf.... and now he has another two with Britney... So Hard to be reliable parents if the parents is like player to break down... Britney wanted to be poplar again like in old days before she mess up.. I have not like Britney spear at all.. For time she is popular celebrate.. From Mickey mouse club to singer.. and actor which was not good at all.. And K-fed wanted to Rap.. he no good at that either....
2007-02-23 21:34:35 · answer #3 · answered by babyg 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is what is called an OXYMORON! The words K-fed or Britney can't be used in the same sentence with "reliable parent"!
It's the same as "army intellegence"! They're contradictions of each other.
2007-02-23 21:23:15 · answer #4 · answered by mad_mick001 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Right now it looks like K-Fed is the better parent and believe me I really do not like making this statement. Britney is way to busy trying to get back in the public eye than taking good care of her kids. Sad isn't it!!!
2007-02-23 21:27:08 · answer #5 · answered by newfiemomma 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I hate to say it but with Britney's recent antics, it actually looks like K-Fed's the reliable one...(I never thought in a MILLION years I'd actually say that!!)
2007-02-23 21:18:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Oooooh that's really hard. Britney's just... bad. She shaved her head... she constantly drinks and drives with the baby in her lap. And K-fed out's to prove that he doesn't suck, but I would have to say K-Fed. But neither are good.
2007-02-23 21:22:28 · answer #7 · answered by Rani 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
well, if i have to choose between those two, defentely k- fed. i mean he's not that bad... sure the guy cant sing and he used britney for her money but that dosent make him a bad father. at least he's with his kids. britney was out all night every night so drunk/ high??? that she forgot to put on underwears!!
2007-02-23 21:23:46 · answer #8 · answered by tru311fan 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Unfortunately if I had to pick right now it would be K-Fed. Britney is out on leave right now, and has posted no time for her return.
2007-02-23 21:18:12 · answer #9 · answered by kam 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Lord, i'd rather give my baby to a hobo then britney or k-fed!!!!
2007-02-23 21:33:02 · answer #10 · answered by footballgirl 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋