9 11 America's attitudes to what really happened at the pentagon?

Question

There was an American documentary shown on Australian television that shows unequivocal evidence from unedited TV news films and other sources that the Pentsgon was not hit by a highjacked jumbo passenger jet but by a cruise missile. See this link for similar material http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/flash.htm#Main The primary evidence is that in all the news films there is no wreckage from the alleged Jet. There are also serious problems with the official description as to the attack at the twin towers (strange attachments under planes etc). Is this information widely known in the US? Is there any kind of furor about this? Is there any kind of objective enquiry planned by the new congress?
Terrorists don't have access to cruise missiles, only a few countries do. If I was an American I would certainly want to know who fired a missile at the countries military HQ and not accept a whitewash that is obviously untruthful. Any links to further information would be greatly appreciated

Some of the anomalies at the twin towers where: both skyjacked planes had unusual large visible structures on their undersides,
Both planes showed flashes like explosions immediately before they struck the towers, a third building collapsed without being struck. Many firemen reported explosions like demolition timed explosions and the towers fell like implosion detonationed demolitions not as they would from an inpact with a jet alone but as if they had been wired with explosives for demolition.

Answer 1

I have found about 1/3 of the U.S. population is either unwilling to accept what most probably happened on 9/11 or scared of G.W. Bush and his buddies since they come off as very vindictive thugs, almost Mafia like.

Another 1/3 are in cahoots with what those thugs pulled off; apparently they feel they stand to gain something.

The last 1/3 are mad as hell, and did what they could to cut the present administrations wings off, in the last election.

The newly elected congress will not be much help in this area, they have chosen to focus on ending the war. I find it difficult to believe that they are not aware of what really took place. There is just so much evidence that shows both the WTC buildings and the Pentagon were attacked by members of our own government; Bush's NeoCon thugs to be more precise.

___________________________________________

Most all the evidence that is available to us, show that the WTC buildings were rigged with explosives. Our own government had motive as was well as an opportunity to do this crime. Here is the evidence, presented for your scrutiny.

FAKE CONFESSION
The official government story is that the 9/11 attack was orchestrated by Al Qaeda, which is lead by Osama bin Laden. The proof our government provided was a video with Osama confessing to the crime. The problem with the video is that the person in the video does not look like Osama bin Laden: See picture.
http://911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pk519bkcLjg

EVIDENCE
There are many other factors that do not fit the official story. They include, secondary explosions that were seen, heard, reported, and recorded by firefighters, in and around the WTC buildings.
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4574366633014832928&q=firefighter+bombs+in+the+building
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHz9YWVgJWM

Here is a video clip showing a trail of explosions just before the destruction wave.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_DkzhonpGY&mode=related&search=

Molten, beyond red hot, "steel" was video recorded coming out of the South Tower just before it collapsed. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to turn steel to liquid. Melted red hot steel was also found in "ground zero" of all three WTC buildings, including WTC7; the one no jet ever hit.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk&search=thermite
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3D2myMbQjQ

FORENSICS
A chemical analysis of the solidified molten iron,conducted by independent firms, yielded an explosive, called Thermite. Also found was a WTC core beam; most probably cut using the demolition cutting charge (Thermate). No core beams were left standing beyond a few feet high, for it to have been cut by an Iron Workers torch.
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc_charges.html

CONFESSION
We also have a video recording, where owner Larry Silverstein, admits to demolishing WTC7.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329

MOTIVE
The New Conservatives (Neo-Cons), started planning the invasion of Iraq, even before Pres. Bush took office. Apparently, the plan would include the attack of the WTC buildings. It did this to get the support of congress and the nation, to attack Iraq. Read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to get the ball rolling.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

OPPORTUNITY
Witnesses saw a work crew going into the WTC buildings with rolls of wire, supposedly for internet upgrades. Tenants were moved around while crews "upgraded" the cable systems. The Port Authority cut power to the building for a whole weekend, just prior to the attack; shutting down the entire security systems. Witnesses also heard crews operating heavy hammering equipment that left a gray cement like dust, in the building. This activity took place just weeks before the 911 attack: The Port Authority had released control of the buildings to Larry Silverstein, six weeks prior to the attack: He made upwards of $5 billion off of the attack.
See "9/11 Mysteries" video: Time = 1:03:55 through 1:07:00 and 1:19:55 through 1:24:09
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=911+mysteries&hl=en-CA

__________________________________

There is also strong evidence to support a Douglas A-3 Skywarrior armed with a missile hit the Pentagon. One thing we can be certain about; it was not a Boeing 757, as our government claims. Listen to this retired General, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole; so what did hit the Pentagon...?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl=

One might expect to see three holes in the pentagon, one for the main body and two more for each engine. The engine and engine parts were found outside of the building, they never penetrated the building thus no hole was created by them. The deep 18 foot hole was most probably made by an on board missile and not the aircraft itself. A radiation expert claims high-radiation readings near the Pentagon indicates depleted uranium (DU) munitions may have been used.
http://www.rense.com/general67/radfdf.htm

Witnesses say, the U.S. military secretly had Raytheon Co. refit an A-3 Skywarrior with new jet engines, a missile, and a Global Hawk guidance system, just prior to 9/11. Coincidentally, five key executives of Raytheon Co. went missing on 9/11. The official word is they died in the hijacked planes on 9/11.
http://tomflocco.com/fs/WitnessesLink.htm

The Jet engine(s) found may be key to identifying what type of aircraft hit the Pentagon: At the very least, they help determine a Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon. Both the jet engine housing as well as a "front end rotor head" have been identified as belonging to a Pratt & Whitney JT8D jet engine. The P&W JT8D engine has been used on the smaller Boeing 727 as well as a retrofit for the A-3 Skywarior. Two P&W JT8D's do not provide enough thrust to get a Boeing 757 off the ground much less sufficient power to perform the military precision maneuvers the aircraft in question did.
http://www.rense.com/general63/ident.htm
http://www.karlschwarz.com/02-02-05_Schwarz.pdf

A photograph of a cracked windshield found at the crash site strongly resembles the top canopy glass found on the Skywarrior: No windows of this shape are found on a Boeing 757.
http://home.att.net/~carlson.jon/911Pentagon.htm

The landing gear is the one part found in the crash site that may be linked to a Boeing 757. It could also be a part that was retrofitted on an A-3 Skywarrior, since the wheels would most likely need to be replaced with something still available.
http://www.pentagonresearch.com/084.html

A geometric analysis can show the aircraft that hit the Pentagon is under 85 feet long and therefore too small to be a Boeing 757, which is over 155 feet long. An A-3 Skywarrior is 76 feet 4 inches long. See geometric analysis: also see revision note under comments.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Avt4N5qfsIKkwbXeL7iLXmPsy6IX?qid=20061122203115AAj8XR6

Answer 2

I used to believe that there was no way a plane hit the pentagon. I also asked how the hell did the towers collapse at the speed of free fall? However, I did more digging and my skepticism was proven wrong. There is a lot of evidence out there that confirms the facts of the attacks.

Now saying that, do I rule out government involvement? I can't. Anything is possible. I think Bush Jr has totally messed up the war. But I also think people who buy into these "theories" basically are dismissed as "wackos" by the public.

If I were going to develop a conspiracy theory, it's more likely the government just let it happen. I believe the government was just incompentent.

It's like when Isreal's battleship was almost sunk by a missle. It wasn't because they didn't have the technology to defend themselves, it's they never turned the radar on.

Answer 3

Unequivocal evidence!!?? Yes, there was an objective inquiry. But you have plenty of fellow-believers in this particular theory over here, even quite a few on Yahoo Answers. I spoke with one author of an article debunking the conspiracy claims and he said he gets all sorts of hate mail because of his article. They think he's part of a plot to cover up the "truth."

Don't believe everything you see on TV, my friend. Especially if it's about the USA and it's on Australian TV.

PS: everyone agrees they had a hijacked airliner they could have crashed into the Pentagon, so if they had a hijacked airliner, what did they need a cruise missile for? And then where did they hide the hijacked airliner?

Answer 4

That is a lot of silly rot!!
That's why it flashed past your eye so quick!
so you couldn't study it!
have a look at the link with the bits of the plane in the photos from EINZELGAEs avatar & you will get some truth!!!
What about all the other attacks the terrorists have done over the years
Is that not true also?
the terrorists did it all & if you think a demolition took place well the terrorists did that also & had this so called steel melting stuff with them as well

Answer 5

How about I accept the dozens of eye witness accounts to the incident. But think about this. From the time GW announced that he was running for office way back when neither he nor any one connected to him has been able to fart with out it being headline new at the NYT. Do you seriously think that he or any one could get away with such a massive cover-up of what your trying to run past us? Where's all the people that were on the damn plane? Sorry bud but with all the people it would have taken to cover this up there is no way in hell that they could have gotten away with it. And don't ry this crap that your films prove your case. You don't have one credible witness or a shred of hard evidence.

Answer 6

People SAW the plane hit the Pentagon. (comments are available on thei internet if you look.)

The USAF had a C130 that SAW the plane headed for the Pentagon but a C130 is not fast enough to catch a jet airliner. (The Pilots testimony is available on the internet)

Parts of the plane were found INSIDE the Pentagon. (Pictures are available on the internet of the wreckage found inside. If the news media could not find the pictures, that does not negate the fact that the wreckage was there and the pictures are available.)

As far as Australia and England having information that is not available in the USA, those who know the least are the best at filling the gaps to a story. By the same logic, why do those in England not know the Queen is letting Harry go to Iraq hoping he is killed as he is gay and they want to be rid of him before the people find out about it. (See how it works? Anyone can make up anything and there are idiots on the internet who believe it.)

If you are surrounded by zebras, see zebras, hear zebras, smell zebras and your foot gets stepped on, do not go looking for elephants.

Four planes were hyjacked. Two hit the WTC. One hit the Pentagon. One crashed in PENN.....end of story......

Answer 7

The pentagon was hit by flight 77. Other stories about what happened have been very successful in discrediting the 9/11 truth movement as a wacko conspiracy group.

http://stj911.org/evidence/pentagon.html

Answer 8

"Unequivocal" ?? Show me a photo of the Pentagon being struck by a cruise missile !! THEN explain away the aircraft wreckage at the scene...

THEN explain where the aircraft that was hijacked went !!

Answer 9

One very ENORMOUS question remains, in spite of all the conspiracy bull sh*t --- what happened to the commercial flights, and all the people aboard them, that crashed into the W.T.C, Pentagon, and Pennsylvania????????????? Show me some irrefutable evidence that those four aircraft arrived safely somewhere, with everyone on board, and I might start re-thinking 9-1-1

Answer 10

Right and they randomly placed burned out plane wreckage inside as well, get back to reality.