2007-02-23 12:39:35 · 4 answers · asked by me w 1 in Environment
The three main ones are these:
The evidence supporting man caused global warming is almost entirely anecdotal as opposed to scientifically demonstrated.
Contrary anecdotal evidence is ignored by GWs supporters.
The entire issue of global warming has become so politicized that any science (and there is a lot of it) supporting a view that the current warming trend is NOT man caused is suppressed and ridiculed by GWs fervent believers.
2007-02-23 13:34:31 · answer #1 · answered by Flyboy 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No legitimate scientists criticize global warming. Only liars like George Bush and Rush Limbaugh criticize global warming.
2007-02-23 21:38:05 · answer #2 · answered by Dennis H 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
uhh, some folks think it is a myth or caused by pollution,
I think it has something to do with fresh water on Earth,
and the fact that wild animals will come closer to humans in search for fresh water supply.
The Earth will get warmer and dryer and demand for water.
Oceans are saltwater, so they dont count.
2007-02-23 21:17:18 · answer #3 · answered by sunflare63 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Like the film says, It's too INCONVENIENT, so they deny it.
hERE'S THE DEAL.IF ITS TRUE THEN THERE WILL HAVE TO BE CO2 CAPS ON INDUSTRY OF THE USA AND THE rEPUBLICANS WHO ARE SHEEP FOR BIG CORPORATIONS SAY THIS WILL CAUSE THEM TO LOSE MONEY. LOTS OF PRO BIZ REPUBS SAY IT WILL CAUSE A DEPRESSION. SO THEY DENY IT. IN OTHER WORDS BIG BIZ IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN SAVING THE WORLD. THEY ARE CLEARLY SICK.
2007-02-23 20:56:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋