English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i'm almost positive it was messed up (cuz i had an older one made and the two have alot of diffs, such as color

2007-02-23 11:46:24 · 2 answers · asked by Ace 1 in Arts & Humanities Genealogy

2 answers

Hey Ace,

A coat of arms you pay for today is just someone making money on you. They do not mean anything today. Are you the eldest son of an eldest son, of an eldest son, and part of an active clan?

You would be better off to spend your money on some Genealogy Software and plot your family tree. That will tell you more about who you come from than any $35 contrived picture. I don't mean to be harsh, but this is the truth.

You may still want to follow up on it, so here are some of the sites that may help you determine what they believe your COA is.

2007-02-23 16:41:03 · answer #1 · answered by BuyTheSeaProperty 7 · 0 0

Other then Scotish Clan and some names in eastern Europe there are no Family name that entitle one to a Coat of Arms nor to a Family crest. Coats of Arms have always been a personal thing and Crest were use to show Loyality to an overlord (nolonger used out side of Scottish Clans).
General speaking Arms are personal not for family . IF there is a Coat of Arms in your family history you may be able to have Lord Lyon or the Garter King of Arms matriculate the arms to you.Worst in the cases of Scottish clan some sites outright urspur the Chief's Arms wich is STILL a crime for wich Lord Lyon can and will (if done in scottland) fine you.

2007-02-26 16:44:30 · answer #2 · answered by Bruce W 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers