Yes, bush went AWOL.
Why would his commanding officer lie?
bush supporters have no answer...just like they don't have the backbone to go fight for dumbya.
2007-02-23 11:00:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
President Bush is not running for office again. He has spent his two terms. This is all that is allowed in the United States for a president to serve. If he went AWOL that is fine. I am sure there are a lot of nice young men and women today that would like to go AWOL if they could. Ancient history does not seem to be taught in schools today, so what is the point.
2007-02-23 11:10:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by grandma 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
a real sign of immaturity is call calling. bill Gates dodged the draft. John Wayne dodged the draft by claiming too many babies. Mel Gibson went to Australia to stay clean of the draft. Sylvester Stallone had a artwork deferment, Abbie Hoffman Resisted the draft, Muhammad Ali refused to pass. call those human beings cowards? His strikes appropriate to Iraq have been set into action some years interior the previous. he's definitely basically a member of an advert hoc committee. he's reported what to do. No guy could make each and all of the selections you babies furnish him credit for. Cowardly strikes? What are they. Why are you now no longer in Iraq once you're so brave? i'm now no longer an ardent Bush supporter yet i'm a supporter of smart verbal replace and questions. As such yours would not bare help.
2016-11-25 19:50:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Did you know that in MANY countries, making slanderous statements about the national leader would get you a visit from the state/security police and you would be dragged out of your house late at night, never to be seen again.
Thank God in heaven you're in America where people can prove they are HEE HAWS all they want.
(USN/retired)
2007-02-24 06:52:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
proof ? name one other TEXAN you ever voluntarily finished his hitch in the TEXAS air national guard , in another state . it's just not done . but all the relevant paperwork is missing , the stuff Rather had was proved a forgery . and who goes around forging that type of old military records ? where's the profit ?
2007-02-23 11:04:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
That is actually an unsubstantiated slander based on falsified documents. This was proven to be untrue the first time President Bush was running for office.
2007-02-23 10:56:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by promethius9594 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
no he didn't they proved he got payed for his time and you don't get payed for going AWOL
2007-02-23 17:33:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
How many times does that have to be proven wrong before you guys drop it.
2007-02-23 11:05:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by al s 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
Enough with this! Why do you care? What have you done for your country beside complain? Do you do ANYTHING to make this country better?
2007-02-23 10:57:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by Superscoot52 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
The only time I ever hear of it is when I am on Yahoo Answers. Sorry, but that source isn't reliable.
2007-02-23 11:12:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6
·
2⤊
3⤋