It's a legitimate question.
2007-02-23 10:06:49 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
The fact that you are asking this question leads me to believe you make no distinction between the two. How incredibly sad.
2007-02-23 10:10:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
I'm tempted to say the RR, but the Republican base seems to be moving toward the center in terms of embracing a more comprehensive range of social and cultural issues and a more objective and neutral stand toward the GOP. The RR is becoming more disenchanted with the politicians who've had them hoodwinked and if that continues, then definately Al-Quaida.
2007-02-23 18:16:16 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that no matter what light you put it in, religion will always be the cause of such terror in the world, in the past, with the Crusades, recently with the Towers, the London bombings, even the Bali attacks five years ago. It will not be different in the future either, everyone will always fight about religion, and there can never be a way for every person in the world to accept just one faith and put an end to fighting in any name of a deity.
Just putting the blame on any one order is just trying to take the focus of the real problem, so Al-Quaida is just the same as Christianity, Catholisicm, Pagan, Voodoo, they just have a few different beliefs.
2007-02-23 18:13:32 · answer #3 · answered by Lief Tanner 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Of course it`s al-quaida , but with a question like that from you makes you a real close 2nd !!! ................ 1 Corinthians 14 : 38.. But if any man be ignorant , let him be ignorant !!
2007-02-23 18:26:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Al-Quaida
2007-02-23 18:09:06 · answer #5 · answered by Zero 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
The religious right without a doubt. They are downright scary and a menace to our basic bill of rights.
2007-02-25 01:58:29 · answer #6 · answered by Sicilian Godmother 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I guess it just depends on YOUR definition of "danger."
My definition of danger means "leads to imminent death." So, gonna have to go with Al Quaeda being the more dangerous one there.
2007-02-23 18:13:56 · answer #7 · answered by scruffycat 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The religious right is definately more dangerous because it is destroying personal freedom and rights from within our own country while Al-Queda tries to do it from afar and fails.
2007-02-23 18:13:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Car bombs VS. abortion clinic bombings?
It's a matter of who's "more" religiously superstitious than the other. And their superstition is equal. Christians once burned women at the stake due to superstition. And Muslims behead people in the name of 72 fictional women.
2007-02-23 18:08:45 · answer #9 · answered by Loathe thy neighbor. 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
The religious right. No contest. Both could terrorize but only the fundies have the capability and desire to change our laws.
2007-02-23 18:12:19 · answer #10 · answered by Sun: supporting gay rights 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋