2007-02-23 04:58:02 · 13 answers · asked by woodsonhannon53 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I heard a comedian say that if women ruled the world you'd end up with scenarios like this:
PM of England (calling President of US): Mrs. President?
Pres. of US: Yes?
PM of England: Are you shooting missiles at us?
Pres. of US: Yes.
PM of England: Why?
Pres. of US: I think you know. Remember 5 years ago? We were at that party? You made that face?
It's funny because it's REALITY!
2007-02-23 05:03:54 · answer #1 · answered by Rossonero NorCal SFECU 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, while we're fully capable, we were not created to be world leaders. Sure, there are advantages to being a woman in this current society, but there are disadvantages too. If we all switched rolls today, I'm sure we'd both be greatly disappointed. Ever try being a woman in a job surrounded by only men? Trying to be treated as an equal proved to be a fruitless endeavor.
2016-05-24 02:41:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, violence is a survival tactic that may be supressed.....in most women...but would come out in an instant and the world would be the same.
What do you think a lioness would do if a predator came close to her cubs? That only shows how violent a female could be....which could be moreso than a male, actually....
2007-02-23 05:05:35 · answer #3 · answered by Virgo 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ever hear of Queen Mary Tudor of England, also known as Bloody Mary? How about Countess Elizabeth Bathory, aka Countess Dracula? Queen Ranavalona of Madagascar, who has been unfavorably compared to Caligula? Gender is not a factor in ability to govern.
2007-02-23 06:03:49 · answer #4 · answered by rich k 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. The only way the world would be better off is if someone invented a common sense pill and everybody took it!
2007-02-23 05:06:22 · answer #5 · answered by peterregan50 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Indira Ghandi, Golda Meier, Margaret Thatcher. There are no guarantees. Perhaps the violence would just be for different reasons. I'd sugget evaluating the person's beliefs, not their sex.
2007-02-23 05:08:55 · answer #6 · answered by skepsis 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, there are some instances where women were in power and they were just as violent, and sometimes more so than men.
Remember the Amazons? Killed all males, only used them to breed when captured in war, then killed them. Killed all male babies.
2007-02-23 05:11:42 · answer #7 · answered by DimensionalStryder 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I sincerely doubt it. Ever been to some girl's sporting events; they're way more violent than the boys.
2007-02-23 05:03:54 · answer #8 · answered by daisyk 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I am female,ever see how far a mother goes to protect Her children.Hell hath no fury like a woman.
2007-02-23 05:11:42 · answer #9 · answered by gwhiz1052 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I shouldn't think so. The sort of personality that seeks the sort of power that rulers wield is pretty much the same in women and men.
2007-02-23 05:01:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋