Was this the city of Lord Krishna?

Question

http://www.hindu.com/2007/02/23/stories/2007022301242200.htm

Answer 1

Yes - exactly. I should be Dwaraka as the informations given by ASI should be true. Thank you very much for the information.

In this connection I give below the excerpts from Wikipedia and some weblinks which also in line with the report of Hindu.

"The recent underwater studies conducted by the ASI (Archeological Survey of India) reveals the existence of city dated to the 2nd millennium BC.

The search for the lost city was going on since 1930's. The Marine Archaeology Unit (MAU) of the National Institute of Oceanography, took part in this search in 1983. This search was carried out in the coastal waters of Dwarka in Gujarat.

Explorations between 1983 and 1990 revealed the well-fortified township of Dvaraka, that extended more than half a mile from the shore. The township was built in six sectors along the banks of a river. The foundation of boulders on which the city's walls were erected proves that the land was reclaimed from the sea.
Dvaraka extended up to Bet Dwaraka (Sankhodhara) in the north and Okhamadhi in the south. Eastward it extended up to Pindara. The general layout of the city of Dvaraka described in ancient texts agrees with that of the submerged city discovered by MAU.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/dwarka... -
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/artic... -
http://www.geocities.com/narenp/history/... -

Answer 2

Supposedly, yes.