English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'm an athiest. I spent 18 years going to a Christian church and therefore know that these two things are the hingepoint upon Christian belief. Can someone who is not an athiest please explain these paradoxes?

1. If god is omnicient, then why did he allow Satan to fall from heaven? Shouldn't he have known it was going to happen?
2. If heaven is the perfect place without sin, how could Satan have become jealous of God's power in the first place?
3. The bible says that God gave Adam and Eve the choice to eat from the fruit of knowledge, but told them they shouldn't. If he's omnicient, that would mean that he knew from the beginning what their choice would be. Why would he pretend to give us choice?
4. If God is omnicient, then he knows every decision that each of us will make for the rest of our lives. Why bother having people live out their lives? Why not just send us all to heaven or hell right now?
5. If God is omnipotent, why is it that he hasn't struck Satan down?

Thx!

2007-02-23 04:54:02 · 3 answers · asked by Luc 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Sorry, I don't accept the answer "God allows Free Will". If he knows the outcome then it's not free will. That's like watching a horse race, then watching a recording of it later and saying the other horses have a chance of winning this time around. God is either omnicient or he's not. If that's the case there is no "free will"

As for the agnostic's response, thanks, but I was looking more for a christian's argument to the paradoxes. I know that religion is about faith, but usually there are counter-arguments to any posed question. I just wish more people had responded.

2007-02-26 06:51:56 · update #1

3 answers

1) Free-Will, God gives everyone one a choice even angels. God knows all possibilities but doesn't stop us from choosing one or the other.

2) If you notice in the end those who choose sin over obediance are removed from heaven and removed from the possibility of going to heaven.

3) *see #1

4) Love cannot be forced on anyone, it must be chosen.

5) *see #1
-------------------------------------------------------

JOHN 14:15

15 ¶ If ye love me, keep my commandments.

2007-02-23 05:07:07 · answer #1 · answered by righton 3 · 1 1

The real answer: religion is not scientific or logical. It's all belief. You either believe it or not. To try to make it logical or analyze it on a purely intellectual level is completely futile. This doesn't stop people from trying, and the results are sometimes interesting, but ultimately, on a grand scale, still unsatisfactory. This is why I'm agnostic, and will remain so until I have experience, not logic, provide me with an "answer."

2007-02-23 05:00:53 · answer #2 · answered by I 3 · 0 1

Wow!!! tremendous observe, dude, even I had to look that one up. that's as close as my dictionary have been given: sycophant |?sik?f?nt; -?fant| noun a guy or woman who acts obsequiously in the direction of somebody with a view to benefit benefit; a servile flatterer. DERIVATIVES sycophancy |-f?ns?; -?fans?| noun sycophantic |?sik??fantik| adjective sycophantically |?sik??fantik(?)l?| adverb commencing place mid sixteenth cent.(denoting an informer): from French sycophante, or by using way of Latin from Greek sukophant?s ‘informer,’ from sukon ‘fig’ + phainein ‘to instruct’ ; the affiliation with informing against the unlawful exportation of figs from historical Athens (recorded by using Plutarch) isn't substantiated. adequate servile flattery for at some point. you could not get into heaven with any volume of servile something. It calls for at the beginning Grace, God calls you! 2nd, you'll have self belief, faith in Jesus Christ is all you should do to get into heaven as quickly as God has referred to as you. no longer by using WORKS! under no circumstances servile flattery, by using which i think of you advise worship. it incredibly isn't any longer worshippers that the church is composed of, yet believers. And why is that this? by means of fact faith is step one in the direction of Love. to be taught to love somebody, you should first have faith them. that's what Jesus is maximum excellent us in the direction of, a society based upon Love. God does not condemn anybody striving to do reliable and help others. i can not think of the place you dreamed that one up, i'm sorry. yet do you advise people who paintings out of secret motives to enhance their own self activity? Tax benefit? exposure? Political activity? Lobbying? Islamic charities who help the sufferers of wars which they started with a view to benefit extra squaddies to start up destiny wars? i think of all smart people drawn to a non violent existence, human rights and liberties, and straightforward dealings between everyone ought to condemn that. Sounds too very like unchristian sycophantism.

2016-12-18 09:27:17 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers