Or do you think it was Marvin Bush who hired them?
2007-02-23 04:35:08 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Well, Larry Silverstein took out that huge multi-billion dollar policy on all the WTC buildings. Hell, he even admitted in the interview on PBS about PULLING the building. People think that was used in the wrong context or something, but bringing down the building was what he said. Building 7 was the furthest away from the towers. There were other buildings parked up against it, that suffered more damage and they didn't go down. Conclusion, if you're building is owned by Larry Silverstein, it will collapse because he has a fat insurance policy on it.
Marvin Bush, the head of security to the WTC ended his contract as security head on 9/11/01. The new guy died in the towers. During his employment, Marvin had parts of WTC 1&2 closed down for security reasons. Along with having power grids shut down. And why were bomb sniffing dogs not allowed in the buildings before 9/11?
They all gained massive amounts of $$$$$$$$!!!! FACT
2007-02-23 04:49:39 · answer #1 · answered by Ted S 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Jeez, here we go again...it NEVER ends.
Okay, answer some basic questions for me, genius.
1) How did ANYONE manage to get their hands on enough explosives to blow up a building of that size LEGALLY and WITHOUT BEING NOTICED BY ANYONE OR ANY AGENCY?
2) How did "they" manage to plant the explosives without anyone noticing? That would involve moving furniture, pulling out drywall, relocating electrical wires, repainting, reconstruction of areas....just how did "they" manage to do this WITHOUT ANYONE NOTICING IT?
3) Just how long did this "undercover operation" go on? In order to plant enough explosives to do what you and the other members of the Tinfoil Hat Brigade says was done, this operation would have taken MONTHS, if not YEARS. A professionally trained demolition team working in a building that has been "prepped" for demolition and totally stripped of all items needs AT LEAST two months to prepare the site....so just how did this get pulled off with the WTC?
4) How did "they" hide the massive amounts of explosives that would have been needed? Out of the hundreds of maintenance people assigned to the WTC buildings and the thousands of outside agency workers that came and went into those buildings each day, how did "they" hide that much explosives from someone who wasn't involved? And don't even try telling me that EVERYONE in the WTC maintenance crew was involved....
So answer my questions with some real, hard, FACTUAL evidence to back it up, skippy.....if you can.
Once again, logic and the facts prove your question - and the conspiracy theory which spawned it - to be nothing more than fantasy and outright lies.
This also proves that you know even less about the WTC than you do about the Pentagon and what commercial airliners are constructed of.
A word of advice: don't give up your day job.
2007-02-23 05:25:36 · answer #2 · answered by Team Chief 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
People need to stop with the conspiracy theories. If you want information on demolition, Dallas Contracting Co., Inc. offers nationwide demolition services.
Dallas Contracting Co., Inc. is a specialized demolition contractor that has been in business for over 26 years. We are financially sound, committed to continuous improvement and innovation and seek alternatives that reduce our client's cost and improve customer satisfaction.
Our core services include demolition contracting services, onsite concrete aggregate crushing, wrecking, scrap metal recycling, demolition consulting, equipment salvage, brownfield cleanup, and decommissioning.
2007-02-23 10:45:10 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Silverstein hired Bush who hired the demolition men.
2007-02-23 05:57:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Keep posting the same question....you're going to get the same answers. Besides...just because you say its so doesn't prove anything. Nor do all those BS conspiracy sites.
2007-02-24 12:01:31 · answer #5 · answered by iraq51 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh God...9/11 conspiracies? please people. www.lolloosechange.co.nr
and even IF Silverstein did it, why would he "admit to it" on tv?
amyway..this doesnt belong in the military category
2007-02-23 05:30:32 · answer #6 · answered by Bill 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No it was the Easter Bunny silly.
2007-02-23 04:39:28 · answer #7 · answered by J S 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
dont think it was one of them they all had something to gain on that day.
2007-02-23 04:39:11 · answer #8 · answered by longshoreman 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
no.
and i think people like you are ultimately saudi apologists...
2007-02-23 04:41:07 · answer #9 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I THINK YOU DID IT.
2007-02-23 04:41:43 · answer #10 · answered by strike_eagle29 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋