Let’s take some guy for example and let’s say he smocks, get drunk and addicted to drugs and let’s also say he is deeply in love with his girl so now take all of these from him, where does he feel the pain? They all hurt his heart, so why are we confusing love with addiction?
If you don’t push your computer or put some force by some means, your computer will remain where it is for ever cuz he is addicted to his state of motion he is in love with it, if your car doesn’t run out of fuel or something stop it, it will keep going forever cuz he don’t want to let go of what he got used to, so it is all about Newton’s law of motion that works for objects the same to emotional motion,
2007-02-23 03:19:16 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
but where is the proof of your question
but i will proof one thing if u come here and take off your blouse
2007-02-23 03:29:33 · answer #1 · answered by heartattack262000 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
So where is this proof that you mention in your question? You are arguing out of anecdote and example, which is not proof. It can potentially be evidence, but you need a lot more than this. Your argument does not take into consideration the infinite other examples and anecdotes that are totally contradictory to your theory. You are also using really weak analogies. Love and emotion are not computers. They are not cars. They are not objects, and therefore are not subject to Newton's Law of Motion. Being addicted to drugs is not necessarily the same as being "addicted to love," as you appear to be proposing here. You also do not define love, or seem to have any idea what love is really like. You have created an abstract version of love that fits into your equation. You are essentially comparing apples and steak and trying to prove that they both are vegetables because you can eat them. That is not a logical argument at all. Try again.
2007-02-23 11:27:34 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. Taco 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's a good theory but completely false. Addiction is a state that only living creatures can feel as is love. When the two go to war against each other whose to say what will win. I like to think that if love is truly strong enough it can win but when someone is addicted they aren't themselves. They can think they feel a lot of things and think that they believe a lot of things. But if they kick their addictions than they start to return to who they are. The fog lifts, the reality sets in... and they aren't the same person. So their beliefs change and their feelings change. Maybe they are so overcome with loss of the addiction that they don't have room to feel love. They just feel empty because they don't know who they are. Just a thought...
2007-02-23 11:27:38 · answer #3 · answered by Phaylynn 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You think you're smart. I can tell.
Unfortunately this makes no sense and does not prove anything except you have too mucf free time on your hands.
In the futures, stay away from guys who 'smock'.
2007-02-23 11:24:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
And your point is? My marrige of 20 years is strong and we are best friends. Even our one bad year actually taught us alot and we are better for it-true love is like your wedding vows-good,bad and sometimes ugly and no matter what you love them anyway and they you. You can't prove to someone who has loved this long and this good that you are right-its an individual thing, a maturity and personal thing. Good luck on that though....
2007-02-23 11:26:00 · answer #5 · answered by ARTmom 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
sounds like there is no love in your world or thats what you believe of that person you are talking about, we are all different , we are all not like the loveless person you got involved with.
2007-03-02 06:25:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
where is the proof that there is no love? the answer is there is no proof that there is no love because for god so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son so you see that there is love that he gave his son up to save you and me and everyone else so there is love
2007-02-23 11:35:18 · answer #7 · answered by Brandi S 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
This is your brain on drugs... pretty scary isn't it? Cohesive thought is good. Try again
2007-02-23 11:27:17 · answer #8 · answered by Felicia 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You have a good point. However, you might want to check your grammar.
2007-02-23 11:26:01 · answer #9 · answered by Hey Brittany, bend over!!! 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What is "smocks"? and isn't dopest only spelled with one p?
2007-02-23 11:22:38 · answer #10 · answered by SEAHAWKS P.O.ED 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋