Once there was a band of adventurers traveling throught the wilderness, on their way to a better land. One day as they went along, they started to get stung by hornets now and then. The leader of the group promised to protect them from hornets.
Eventually they came upon a hornets' nest high up in a tree. The leader of the group ordered his aides to poke the nest with a sharp stick, hoping to dislodge the nest and destroy it once and for all. But this only made the hornets angry, and sting them even more.
Some members of the group started to disagree with the strategy of poking the hornets' nest, and urged them to walk away from it. For this, they were denounced as traitors by the rest. They were called "pro-hornet", and accused of undermining those using the stick, of giving aid and comfort to hornets, even of wanting their own group to be stung to death. "If we walk away from the nest", they were warned, "we will appear weak, and the hornets will surely follow us!"
2007-02-23
03:14:46
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Military
So they kept on poking, and the hornets kept on swarming and stinging, and they made no further progress on their journry.
2007-02-23
03:15:31 ·
update #1
Now for the mentally challenged, here's an explanation of the parable:
The wilderness group is US.
The leader is Bush.
The hornets are terrorists.
Poking with a stick is the Bush policy.
So, is dissent REALLY traitorous, pro-terrorist, and anti-American? Isn't it in order when our policies don't work, and are frankly counterproductive?
2007-02-23
03:17:34 ·
update #2
WHO has ever discussed "surrendering"?
We got to do something better than poke with a stick. And poking the WRONG hornet's nest! Iraq did NOT attack us. They were NOT in league with Al Qaeda!
2007-02-23
03:30:13 ·
update #3