I plead Guilty Sir!
Sorry that's the best way to get out of court faster for a speeding ticket. The Judges have heard all the excuses before. I think like an Officer, the Judge would be more willing to lessen the fine if you take responsibility for your actions. The fact that you don't have an excuse means that you are guilty. Why fight it? You knew you were speeding, you knew it was against the law, you knew if you got caught you would have to pay a fine. So now that it has all happened, what are you afraid of? That is the problem with the wold today. People don't want to take responsibility for what they know they did.
2007-02-23 03:06:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by thanson73 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
I HAD 2 P
2007-02-23 03:38:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by pompanopete0 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It can backfire, but put out questions about the device they used to measure your speed.
If it's a laser, you're SOL. These things are pretty bloody accurate and don't tend to lose their calibration.
However, if it's a FMCW radar, there's something you can do. This type of radars relies on a frequency modulation embedded in the radar wave as a timing marker and if it's not calibrated just perfect, it can give false readings in either directions.
Also, what other vehicles were around you? If there as an 18-wheeler, he could have picked that up.
And what were the conditions like? Weather does murder to any kind of telemetry equipment and nasty conditions like heavy rain or fog, or snow can render the most advanced system next to useless.
2007-02-23 09:05:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Admit it.. you were speeding, or you wouldn't be asking for an excuse. Pay the ticket. Yeah, it sucks! But that's the chances you take when you break the law. We all do it. No one is exempt! If you get caught, fess up! Tell the cop.. "Hey, I'm sorry. I got caught up in my own selfishness and broke the law. Thanks for putting me back in check." Then pay the ticket! Don't waste tax payers money (MY MONEY!) by going to court to fight something you know you did!
2007-02-23 03:37:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by naliwad 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
That argument is what's many times a "confession." The regulation would not limit rushing till everybody else is doing it. It prohibits rushing. you could question the officer's means to computer screen however the undeniable fact that others have been rushing means no longer something. I remember countless human beings rushing. One have been given pulled over. the motive force asked the cop, "why did you provide up me as unfavourable to each and all of the others?" The cop spoke back "you have been the single that stopped."
2016-11-25 01:51:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Provided that you have verifiable documentation - a medical emergency of some sort usually wins. But it has to be an emergency at the time you're stopped not responding to a hospital for someone else or the like. Also usually doesn't work if you are caught in excess of 100mph.
2007-02-23 06:12:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you were not speeding and can PROVE it, then do so. If you just want to take a chance on convincing the judge without PROOF and without witnesses, then you're much better off paying the ticket.
2007-02-23 03:01:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by snvffy 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pay the ticket. Take some responsibilty for your stupidity and recklessness. Or whoever you may be asking this question for should do the same. Dips never think about the consequenses until you get into hot water...then like worms they all try and wiggle out of it.
2007-02-23 03:06:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Quasimodo 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Unless you were on your way to the emergency room - there is no argument you can use. You are responsible for your actions - now accept the consequences of them!
2007-02-23 04:43:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
A speedy argument of admitting the offence!
2007-02-23 02:56:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Sami V 7
·
2⤊
0⤋