we manage to get out of ireland,lets do kosovr, leave that, lets go to iraq,hang on lets do afghanistan as well. Why didnt we just invade france or italy? it would all have been over in two days,or even the Isle of Wight!!!!!!!
2007-02-23 02:27:18 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
shortage of troops,
2007-02-23 04:35:44 · answer #1 · answered by quasar 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wish i knew im a serving soilder and didnt agree with the invasion of iraq when i was sent in 2001, and am just about to deploy again for another six month tour, and will probably end up in afgan soon after, most of my regiment feel the same and we dont want to go but blair id so far up bushes ar$* we might as well be part of america, i just pray at the next election he gets booted out and the next prime minister has some balls to pull troops out.
2007-02-23 03:57:05 · answer #2 · answered by The Doctor 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
before everything, i'm so sick of ignorant White people asserting that Obama is racist. His Father became African and he became raised by employing his White mom. he's probable the main distinctive flesh presser we've ever seen. additionally the turn flopping ingredient is a comedian tale!! all of us desire a President it truly is keen to alter his stance while it is going to income the extra advantageous sturdy of people. it truly is why we desire Bush long gone via fact he's so thick skulled and wont budge on issues that are hurting us. to answer your question Afghanistan is the place the conflict must be. it truly is the place the individuals who destroyed the twin Towers have been born and experienced. it truly is the country that harbors an unyeilding hatred of united statesa. and could attempt to smash united statesa. by employing any means. Iraq's conflict is with Israel. they have been combating via fact the bible days and could proceed until Jesus comes back. we are allies to Israel and ofcourse there is the oil that the U. S. gets from the middle East is the clarification that we are over there while the actual enemy to united statesa. is Afghanistan. Osama ben weighted down orcanstrated an attack on American soil and we've no longer chanced on him yet. Sadam Huessin in simple terms stated that he became chuffed what happend to us via fact of our allegence to Israel and we went and snached him up immediately!! That became no longer a sturdy adequate reason to pass to conflict with Iraq in case you inquire from me. Bush had own and finicial motives for the conflict in Iraq that have no longer something to do with national safety. Obama needs to concentration our efforts on the actual enemy and danger. He would not have a private time table or interest!!
2016-12-14 03:54:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I understand that there are not enough troops in Afghanistan so they are pulling them out of Iraq to send them to another of the Great Warmonger's trouble spots.
2007-02-23 02:42:38 · answer #4 · answered by Beau Brummell 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
in fact more troops from all over the world should be sent to Iraq Syria Iran and Afghanistan because they host terrorist organizations
2007-02-23 02:54:35 · answer #5 · answered by drfreud 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because we are losing the war in Afghanistan and the Americans need to build their oil-pipeline through there.
2007-02-23 03:12:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cost. We don't have enough troops for both theatres. Something about defence cuts and chickens coming home to roost.
2007-02-23 02:32:48 · answer #7 · answered by michael w 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Maybe Blair the buffoon is playing a game of chess with his soldiers!
2007-02-23 02:30:28 · answer #8 · answered by Sami V 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
For real. Prince Harry hasn't seen enough combat yet.
2007-02-23 02:33:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Because Blair is an evil, twisted TW*T
2007-02-23 02:34:51 · answer #10 · answered by Hove Andrew 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋