Law is not so much what legislatures declare it to be; law, instead, is the complex of norms and expectations that motivate most people in a community. In some states – including, I believe, Georgia, Massachusetts, and Mississippi – the legislative codes still prohibit sexual intercourse between unmarried persons. Suppose you’re a resident of one of these states and you’re called to jury duty. The case is State v. Jones, where the state government is prosecuting Ms. Jones (an adult) for having voluntary sex with her boyfriend (also an adult) in the privacy of their own home. Would you vote to convict Ms. Jones even if both Jones and her boyfriend admit that they are not married to one another but that they routinely have sex with each other in private?
Would you find it compelling if someone argued “Look, I personally have no problem with unmarried adults voluntarily having sex with each other. But the law’s the law! If unmarried adults want to have sex, let them do it legally;
2007-02-23
01:58:13
·
4 answers
·
asked by
steve c
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Immigration
True Little buy blue - OF Course kids out of wedlock can cost the economy you idiot. Not that I'm against it.
Why lecture law is law if you only follow some of them yourself.
FYI
There are also laws down south that it's illegal to screw a chicken.
Weird, but I suppose there wouldn't be a law if there wasn't a problem.....
2007-02-23
03:21:29 ·
update #1