of War Crimes, buffoonery, and a general embarrassment to the US.
Sentenced, if found Guilty to:.................?
2007-02-22 23:22:49 · 17 answers · asked by DAVE 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Guilty obviously...In the first place he'd no reason to invade Iraq and that's why he manipulated evidences against it...Then staying the course even after its evident that the troops are getting a rough beating...And to cap it all,he's announced a troop surge......He's gone deep into the road of bloopers....If he wanna set things right then he gotta come to the point from where he started and Bush thinks if he does that, it will mean a failure to his govt.....And so he's culpable and the punishment appropriate is pulling the troops back and reconstructing Iraq even if it costs the earth
2007-02-22 23:30:20 · answer #1 · answered by vinodh S 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Not Guilty. The only thing that he is guilty of is not being able to communicate his actions to the public in a way that off-sets the media bias and ignorance of the self-centered general public..
2007-02-23 00:35:48 · answer #2 · answered by DrB 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Guilty!
Sentence: A lengthy stay in Abu Gharbi prison or maybe Guantanamo. Then to be let out naked on a street in Bagdhad in a crowd of grateful Iraqis he has freed.
2007-02-22 23:31:57 · answer #3 · answered by Frank R 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
in case you would be extra specific i ought to comprehend what those crimes are. He replaced into interior of his power to deliver the militia to Afghanistan and Iraq and get Congressional approval to do flow into those international locations even nonetheless he did no longer desire it. They arrested Saddam and drove the Taliban out of finished power in Afghanistan. The Iraq conflict might have been a mistake in hindsight yet Saddam positioned out a lot phony concepts to intelligence that he replaced into appeared to have WMDs. i think of in spite of if he have been charged, the president might pardon him (even Obama) through fact attempting him does no longer be in the final pastime of the country with all the different issues this is dealing with. I incredibly have heard of no such stream to attempt him for conflict crimes.
2016-10-16 07:42:27 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you can't declare bush guilty first America has to recognize the international criminal tribunal at the Hague then he can be put on trial
2007-02-23 05:08:05 · answer #5 · answered by general De Witte 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NOT GUILTY.. I see him as the only one with the intestinal fortitude in Washington to make the right decisions!!
2007-02-23 00:45:28 · answer #6 · answered by play_quick_plz 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I believe hi is guilty but it could be worse.
Sentenced, if found Guilty to: only God knows
2007-02-22 23:27:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Guilty and sentenced by the family members of all those affected by his crimes.
2007-02-22 23:25:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
guilty
2007-02-22 23:45:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm sorry I am unable to participate in this farcical attempt at illogic and hatemongering.
Thank you for 2 more points.
2007-02-23 00:45:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋