do you think they should bring back the death penalty for child sex offenders?

Question

i think they get off far to easy ! let me know what u think

i do understand kids can lie but im on about convicted sex offenders who are known to police.

Answer 1

No. This country and the European Union are quite correct in outlawing capital punishment.

Criminals are convicted on evidence that is "beyond reasonable doubt" which although is a high standard, is not "beyond ALL doubt". There are been plenty of cases in the past 30 or 40 years where the police have got it wrong. Even this week it was announced that thousands of cases involving DNA evidence are having to be reviewed owing to procedures being wrongly implemented. No criminal justice system is perfect.

A death sentence, once carried out, cannot be compensated for. America shows that the death penalty is not a deterrent. Paedophiles require to be isolated from the community and treated for their illness as well as punished. If they cannot be safely returned to the community at large, then a life sentence has to mean life.

Children need our protection. Let us not become monsters in achieving this aim.

Answer 2

It would be very easy to agree with you (and get 10 points for just confirming your bias by saying "Yeah, string 'em up")
However
If you think dispassinately for a second...
1) there is a whole range of offences which fall under 'child sex offences', so you have to specify what you mean. - would you have someone executed because they had downloaded 1,000 child porn picture for example? .....what about 100? ... what about 10?
2) False memory syndrome is a very real situation, where perfectly innocent men (and women) have been vilified for no real reason, apart from one persons imagination.
3) Children do *sometimes* lie about things, and - being emotionally immature - they compund the lie, rather than backing down, especially if this seems easier, and they get lots of support for their lie.

Make no mistake I DO take child sex offences seriously. I DO NOT support, excuse or condone ANY child sex offence, and - maybe - some offenders do get off too easily.

but, just to say "kill 'em all" doesn't help the victim, the offender or society in general

Answer 3

I think they should suffer big time. Not let them live in a prison with tele, pool tables and things like that. They need a prison where they get nothing and they have to slop out each morning. They could have there fingers and bits cut off too. Dam this subject gets to me, how can they let some of them out on good behaviour? they are only good so they can go out again and hurt some other child. or they go to some place they have to stay in and be back at certain times but no watches them through the day. And this tagging thing well how do they know what they are doing?
Just let them rot

Answer 4

The death penalty system already has problems. Here are some verifiable and sourced facts about it- then you can make up your own mind using common sense.

Re: Alternatives
48 states have life without parole on the books. It means what it says, is swift and sure and is rarely appealed. Being locked in a tiny cell for 23 hours a day, forever, is certainly no picnic. Life without parole incapacitates a criminal (keeps him from re-offending) and costs considerably less than the death penalty.

Re: Possibility of executing an innocent person
Over 120 people on death rows have been released with evidence of their innocence. Many had already served over 2 decades on death row. If we speed up the process we are bound to execute an innocent person. Once someone is executed the case is closed. If we execute an innocent person we are not likely to find that out and, also, the real criminal is still out there.

Re: DNA
DNA is available in no more than 10% of murder cases. It is not a miracle cure for sentencing innocent people to death. It’s human nature to make mistakes.

Re: Appeals
Our appeals system is designed to make sure that the trial was in accord with constitutional standards, not to second guess whether the defendant was actually innocent. It is very difficult to get evidence of innocence introduced before an appeals court.

Re: Deterrence
The death penalty isn’t a deterrent. Felony rates are actually higher in states with the death penalty than in states without it. Moreover, people who kill or commit other serious crimes do not think they will be caught (if they think at all.)

Re: cost
The death penalty costs far more than life in prison. The huge extra costs start to mount up even before the trial. There are more cost effective ways to prevent and control crime.

Re: Who gets the death penalty
The death penalty isn’t reserved for the “worst of the worst,” but rather for defendants with the worst lawyers. When is the last time a wealthy person was sentenced to death, let alone executed??

Re: Victims families
The death penalty is very hard on victims’ families. They must relive their ordeal in the courts and the media. Life without parole is sure, swift and rarely appealed. Some victims families who support the death penalty in principal prefer life without parole because of how the death penalty affects families like theirs.

Opposing the death penalty doesn’t mean you condone brutal crimes or excuse people who commit them. According to a Gallup Poll, in 2006, 47% of all Americans prefer capital punishment while 48% prefer life without parole. Americans are learning the facts and making up their minds using common sense, not revenge or an eye for an eye mentality.

Answer 5

Let me start by saying a study has been done about sex offenders that prove the reason for their acts has to do with a problem in their brain, but in attempt to go into their sick little heads and fix this malfunction will kill them. With that being said, I believe anyone convicted for sexually molesting our most precious asset, children, should have to volunteer their brains in an attempt to find a surgical way to fix the malfunction. And if they die from the surgery, well tell me where the loss is?

Answer 6

Yes, if it could be proven 100%. But many innocent people have been executed in the past, resulting in the abolishing of capital punishment. This is an argument that will run and run, and there are many good examples, both for, and against.
I personally think it SHOULD be brought back into force in U.K, but only under extreme cases (terrorism, multiple killers, drunk drivers who kill, repeat sex offenders and child killers)
But as I said only if 100% proven guilty.

Answer 7

Yes, but it would never happen. Articicle 2 Right to Life Human Rights Act 1998, is a fundamental right. If the government ever legislation to reintroduce dealth penalty then they would have to repeal the HRA 1998.

Answer 8

Unfortunately for the majority who think the death penalty should be brought back for child molesters they cannot due to the fact that the European Convention on Human Rights abolished the death penalty

Answer 9

i'm able to't sympathise with the guy's crime, yet this guy probable had kin who're now listening to and gazing those memories and that i do have massive sympathy for them. it really is tricky to take an ethical intense floor about being extra appropriate than human beings and then descending to below animals in tearing up one among our own this type. i ask your self how lots of those in touch, who were given over excited interior the nice and cozy temperature of the mob second, now sense shamed and really ill at what they have performed, they have dedicated homicide no longer an act of justice. I agree thoroughly that our own justice equipment has obviously failed at the same time as human beings like this are on the line notwithstanding it really is not any excuse for this crime. i imagine it really is ordinary to say the way you would not hesitate to kill someone who dedicated such dreadful crimes yet very diverse at the same time as confronted with it in genuine life in a one-to-one subject. If the wide-spread public sense so strongly that the death penalty must be re-presented then they ought to vote to that end on the subsequent election and then stay with it. Having vigilantes as regulation makers hasn't ever been a reliable equipment of justice, we favor our guidelines to be set by the state, yet we also favor those who uphold the regulation to have the equipment mandatory and the courts to act to that end. we favor to settle for criminals have particular human rights yet no longer on the cost of their victims rights to justice and to stay without concern. Human nature is often agressive at the same time as inspired and this guy became no longer weeded out he became targeted and destroyed and that i ask your self what percentage below 18's were witness to this. little question some one will declare some repayment for the "trauma" of witnessing the shape firsthand, or would nicely be it really is in simple terms me being cynical.

Answer 10

Yes i agree. These perverts know if they get caught they will either go on a sex offenders record or be imprisoned in a special wing/section where they are treated with kid gloves. Castrate them or hang them high.