Would you be in favor in banning partial birth abortion under normal conditions?

Answer 1

Actually that is not true there is a man in missouri who will abort at any stage in pregnancy, his nick name on CNN is miller the baby killer. he uses the excuse that the woman is depressed and thats his medical reason for aborting them and they arent doing anything to stop him. infact one girl came on Cnn and told the world how he does, and to me its sick. this man has aborted babies as the mother was in labor. i think abortion is wrong and if someone can enjoy sex they can enjoy the gift that can come from it. and btw no one is stopping this miller guy that makes it worse. hes the jack kavorkian for babies.

Answer 2

Most certainly. If you waited this long just have it and give it up for adoption. I don't agree with abortion at all in most cases though there are exceptions for everything. But waiting that long and partially delivering a child that could probably survive already should be banned. I think once the child could live outside the womb it should be considered murder.

Answer 3

to each action there is an equivalent and opposite reaction---to each regulation or judgement, there is an equivalent and opposite way of analyzing it.... A partial beginning abortion could desire to in hassle-free terms be used at circumstances while there's a extreme possibility to the mum's existence or well-being... no longer in hassle-free terms as a thank you to discard an undesirable new child----i'm professional ABORTION, yet to no longer the element the place they wait 22 or 20 WEEKS to decide on they do no longer want a sprint one..... This female who has had 4 partial beginning abortions could desire to have her VIGINA SOWN close or superglued mutually completely----i do no longer in hassle-free terms like the assumption of ladies human beings donning basically approximately to finished time era and then figuring out "heck i do no longer want it" and removing it...i do no longer think of that became the unique motive of Roe V. Wade the two...yet regrettably some human beings obtainable'll interpret something to the extreme and others are a sprint greater logical and functional........If partial beginning abortions are nevertheless criminal then i think that's a female's selection yet i could desire to by no skill comprehend why somebody might wait 22 weeks with a superbly sturdy fetus and then abort... My theory could be that if a fetus could desire to stay to tell the story outdoors the womb (and it may desire to at 22 weeks), then until eventually there's a extreme possibility to the mum, the little you could still desire to be carried to time era--taken at present far off from a female like your so noted as "chum".... human beings like that don't need to have the main appropriate to even CONCEIVE a new child...

Answer 4

There are no such things as Partial birth abortions in the United States. What you refer to is when a fetus is "elminated" and still alive, before 22 weeks this is EXTREMELY rare, after 22 weeks it is becoming more and more common because of advances in medical science. That is why late term abortions beyond the 22nd week in the U.S. are illegal. If a doctor/hospital/clinic are performing abortions past the 22nd week they are doing so illegally and should be turned in to the authorities.

Answer 5

It needs to be banned all together!!! It's very sick!!!