2007-02-22 15:56:15 · 12 answers · asked by LostMyMind 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
COMPARE BIBLE VERSES
KJV Bible 1611 published.
1 Kings 6:1 And it came to pass in the four hundred and eightieth year after the children of Israel were come out of the land of Egypt, in the fourth year of Solomon's reign over Israel, in the month Zif, which is the second month, that he began to build the house of the LORD.
New World Translation, about 1961 published.
1Kings 6:1; And it came about in the four hundred and eightieth year after the sons of Israel came out of the land of Egypt, in the fourth year, in the month of Ziv, that is the second month, after Solomon became king over Israel, that he proceded to build the house to Jehovah.
From reading either verse, was time from Egypt when Moses was age 80, or was time from heirs when Moses was age 120? How much careful study does one have to do to know the truth here?
2007-02-22 16:12:20 · answer #1 · answered by jeni 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i does no longer say it fairly is the only actual Bible. despite the fact that this is an exceptionally reliable translation this is worded very heavily alongside the lines of the unique Hebrew text textile. It continuously renders hebrew words/words with a similar English equivalent for consistency. i come across it very usefull in seeing the entire use in the scriptures of the Hebrew word for soul which many different translations generally translate to the effective meaning like 'existence', or 'being' incredibly of keeping the literal word meaning - 'soul'. as a effect, if using different such Translations you do no longer benefit from the entire use and meaning of the Hebrew word for soul in the Bible. through precise rendering of God's own call, Psalm one hundred ten:a million is lot clearer and makes so a lot extra sense in the NWT than in lots of different Translations. I particularly propose it. yet do no longer take my word. study it with any Bible showing the unique Hebrew language text textile and additionally you will possibly see. .
2016-10-16 07:24:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The New World Translation is the Jehovah Witness' Bible. It's been corrupted and changed to promote their views. Better to stay away from it. I would suggest the New King James or the New American Standard.
2007-02-22 16:02:48 · answer #3 · answered by ted.nardo 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is nothing particularly special about any given English version of the bible. All such are translations from earlier texts (complete with some notorious errors, of which the most flagrant must be from the Greek word for "young woman" to the English word "virgin").
2007-02-22 16:04:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. This was brought out in a court case. The "translators" of this version were proved to not be able to read Greek or Hebrew. - Scottish Court Sessions in November, 1954
Read the New King James version instead.
2007-02-22 15:59:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Pasters of high denomination of Christianity declared that there are 50,000 errors in Holy Bible.
www.jamaat.net/bible/AwakeArticle(1957).html
www.al-sunnah.com/bible.htm - 43k.
www.muslimworld.co.uk/errorsinbible.htm
www.ahmed-deedat.co.za/bible/14.html
Example of biblical interpolation, corruption and addition by pasters and these pasters deserve the plague according to Jesus pbuh.
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Bible/NLT/nlt_exposed.htm
http://www.jesus-is-lord.com/nivdelet.htm
Corruption and interpolation in bible exposed.
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Bible/american_standard_version_expose.htm
16 Pasters of high rank removed the verse John 5:7 from Bible. Because this verse advocates the concept of trinity.
http://www.30below.com/~ethanl/1John5v7.html
www.1john57.com
www.wayoflife.org/fbns/defending1.htm
www.studytoanswer.net/bibleversions/1john5n7.html
There are more than 2,000 versions of bible in this world.
Seventh Day Adventists and Jehovah's Witnesses.
First Roman Catholic Bible was published at Rheims in 1582.
Second one published at Douay in 1609.
These called RCV version of Bible.
The Protestants regarded 7 books as ‘apocrypha’ (doubtful authority) and removed them from Bible.
(The Book of Judith
The Book of Tobias
The Book of Baruch
The Buck of Esther, etc. )
Jesus pbuh said in the book of Revelation Chapter 22 Verse 18-19 ". . . If any man shall add to these things (or delete) God shall add unto him the plagues written in this Book."
On deleting 7 books from bible, the Catholics call ‘cult of Christianity’ to the Seventh Day Adventists and Jehovah's Witnesses.
2007-02-22 16:04:26 · answer #6 · answered by Punter 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No read the King James version only.
2007-02-22 15:59:33 · answer #7 · answered by powerliftingrules 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it is. It is the same as any other translation or version. Same concepts, teachings...slightly different wording.
2007-02-22 16:00:05 · answer #8 · answered by surfchika 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
imo it doesnt capture the same soul as the kjv ... but keep them both open and use a concordance and an english/greek translator to while ur studying ...
2007-02-22 16:00:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
NO WAY! it is the weakness of the Jehovah witness's, an example of what men do to change God into their own form of god. But telling lies won't change the truth. Hell is real, Jesus is God. No matter what the jw's want to believe.
2007-02-22 16:01:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋