English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why would God engage in punishment that seems so cruel?

2007-02-22 14:32:29 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

9 answers

Good question...God would not be party to anything as sordid as torture; Christians can agree on that. However, theologians are divided about how eternal judgment is not tantamount to such.

Two competing answers are proposed: (1) Yes, hell involves eternal pain inflicted on the unsaved, but this should not be regarded as gratuitous, unjust, or cruel; and (2) the final judgment will not involve eternal, conscious torment as has been traditionally assumed, and this misreading of biblical teaching needs modification. Both sides raise legitimate concerns worth careful consideration.

The first position is the view of most Christians. It argues that people commonly underestimate the appropriate punishment for defying an infinitely holy God. When human rebellion wrecked God's original good design, God undertook, at great cost, to restore humans to a loving relationship with himself. Those who spurn God's love deserve their eternal destiny, justly suffering the pain of God's wrath.

Of course, God alone has the right to execute this type of sentence. And God gets no sadistic enjoyment from pain he inflicts (Ezek. 18:23, 32). In righteousness and justice, God exacts deadly retribution for wickedness on those not under the blood atonement of Christ.

Other Christians argue that God would never be so seemingly punitive or vicious. They say the Bible's imagery occasionally reflects vindictive presuppositions of ancient cultures, but no one should take this imagery literally. Since rejection of God's love is reprehensible, they say, God will ultimately (and here the answers vary): overcome all evil and all resistance (universalism), destroy all evil (annihilation-ism), or inflict only as much pain as is necessary to extract repentance, leaving only the incorrigibly evil in everlasting pain (a purgatorial view of hell).

As we contemplate the questions raised by hell, it is helpful to remember two strands of complementary biblical teaching. First, just sentences for sin, as described in Scripture, are both proportional and prorated. Divine punishment is meted out in accordance with the severity of a crime and the awareness a person had of God and of sin. To whom much is given, much is required.

The Deuteronomy code forbade beating a guilty person beyond 40 lashes, lest the person be "degraded" (Deut. 25:3). In addition, although a person guilty of heinous crimes might be executed, nowhere was infliction of pain over a lengthy period of time commanded or countenanced. That is partly why medieval Christians constructed an elaborate purgatorial scheme, which allowed for varying levels and lengths of suffering, and which posited a host of variables that God might take into account in rendering verdicts (see Luke 12:47-48). In purgatorial hell, only incorrigibly evil people suffered a limitless duration of pain (see Rev. 14:9-11). This view has never been common among Protestants, but believing in purgatory as the state that purifies and hell as the state of eternal damnation continues to be an official teaching of the Roman Catholic Church.

Second, we must remember that it is never cruel for God to enforce penalties appropriate to crimes committed. Pity toward the guilty is actually suppressed in the Old Testament (Deut. 7:2, 16; 19:21; 25:12). We sometimes assume that this stands in contrast to Christ and his work. It does not. Indeed, God in the Old Testament may have overlooked some wrongs as a concession to the immaturity of his people, but he never forbade them to do something (showing pity to the guilty, in this case) that Jesus later declared to be godly. Jesus came to fulfill the Old Testament, not to overturn it....

2007-02-22 14:51:24 · answer #1 · answered by Glory to God 5 · 5 0

Yes. Because we are given the intellectual capacity, freedom and time from adolescent until death to find Him. But we choose to drink, cheat, lie, steal, smoke pot, exploit, get laid and spread STD all in the name of progress, modernism etc self-worshiping and desire-driven.

I saw a guy with one eye (the other one was stitched close) and I thank God for a pair of eyes that I have with its magnificent function to capture light, colour, image spontaneously auto-focusing without fail or heavy maintenance or upgrade, with mega-pixels no man-made device can match.

All praise be to God and save me from hell-fire for I am submitting to You alone.

2007-02-22 14:57:15 · answer #2 · answered by abuadam the malay bloke 2 · 0 2

A loving God would never tolerate Hell. So one or the other or both must not exist.

2007-02-22 14:39:42 · answer #3 · answered by Mike J 2 · 0 4

Hell was Created for satan, people were never suppose to go there.
If your Seperated from GOD, Spiritually, and Leave the Earth for Good, you will Stay Seperated from GOD (and, kept in Hell) for a Long Time.
Ditto.........

2007-02-22 14:38:21 · answer #4 · answered by maguyver727 7 · 0 5

Hell is a Christian and Muslim afterlife. So is Heaven, or Paradise. Every religion has it's own afterlives. No faith is universal. Only Christians and Muslims, those who have either failed Jesus or Allah, will be in Hell. You will not find anyone of any other religions in Hell. Get over it.

2007-02-22 14:42:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 5

Hell doesn't actually exist, it was a creation of ancient peoples who were just scared and trying to find answers.

2007-02-22 14:37:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

No, it's a city in Michigan.

2007-02-22 14:39:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

well...that's the point.
no god who was worth anything would do that.
bingo.

2007-02-22 14:37:41 · answer #8 · answered by Born of a Broken Man 5 · 1 4

Sounds like it...As for why, because he can.

2007-02-22 14:37:52 · answer #9 · answered by Philly Guy 2 · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers