2007-02-22 13:58:15 · 17 answers · asked by lobazo 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
God bless the Brits but i think Tony Blair just couldn't fade the heat anymore. he was with us there for as long as he could stay, i think.
2007-02-22 14:02:53 · answer #1 · answered by Jerry_S. 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Blair was a coward for not standing up to Bush in the first place. He should have refused to join in the whole Iraq farce from day one. The majority of the British people were against the war. We held the biggest demonstration in the history of our country against British participation in the invasion. If Bush loses the next election, how long before American troops are brought home? Will Americans be accusing themselves of cowardice when that happens? It's funny how the British were America's best friend and ally at the start of this war but now Americans are calling us cowards. Never mind.
2007-02-26 00:24:10 · answer #2 · answered by teamtiddles 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Poor Tony Blair - he tried to support George as long as he could. But he's now got his own problems to worry about. With Little Prince Harry going over there, he would make an excellent little hostage for those Iraqis - and one hell of a nightmare for Blair.
Also, Tony knows he has absolute no chance of re-election if he doesnt start doing something about Iraq. The British opposition are looking forward to an Iraq disaster to help swing the polls at the next election. A major disaster in Iraq like the kidnapping of Prince Harry would just absolutely play into the hands of the opposition.
If only Harry would stay at home and play with his guns.....
2007-02-23 18:36:56 · answer #3 · answered by Big B 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Vice President Cheney Says British Troop Withdrawal Is Positive Sign... turning that part of Iraq over to Iraqi citizens.
2007-02-22 14:06:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The United States was foolish for sending troops to Iraq in the first place, the Brits aren't cowards for pulling out, lol.
2007-02-22 14:07:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think the British are cowards at all. While I do support the Iraqi war, I also think we should be grateful that Great Britain went to war with us. But them, like us, are sick of it over there. They're just leaving before us. But believe me, if it weren't for England, we probably couldn't have accomplished half of the things without their help.
2007-02-22 16:58:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it seems they are over run with people from that region in England and will probably need troop strenght at home, to avoid having their own 9/11.
2007-02-22 14:09:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They no longer cowards, all that is going on over there is city fights its valueless to be there. All they do is combat insurgents, there no longer taking on so why be there and have the prospect of being shot.
2016-10-16 07:12:56 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, they're just smarter. Not smarter than the Chinese though. Chinese are the ones who didn't spend a single penny on this war and they will have most benefit from oil. Good for them!
2007-02-22 14:10:02 · answer #9 · answered by KillerKat 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As history has shown us, the Brits always run home with their tail between their legs.
2007-02-22 14:19:58 · answer #10 · answered by Jack 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋