English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

Sadly, many are immigrating here and residing here in this country only to take and take and not give back. They're not citizens, they don't try to learn the primary language of this country, and they most certainly don't try to "fit in" with American citizens. They want what they want, when they want it, and how they want it..

Oh yeah, we can't forget the fact that the majority who are migrating here legally or illegally are, in fact, Hispanic or Mexican or Honduran, etc. They think that this is their homeland and that we stole it from them. They're trying to take over this country - so I will assume that there will be more violence going on than there is now as Americans try to defend what our forefathers fought so hard for.

We already have plenty of people residing here in this country. Thousands of children are being born each day. We don't need anyone else coming here and continually violating our rights as American citizens.

-------------------------------------------------

1.) To destroy America, turn America into a bilingual or multi-lingual and bicultural country." History shows that no nation can survive the tension, conflict, and antagonism of two or more competing languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual; however, it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. The historical scholar, Seymour Lipset, put it this way: 'The histories of bilingual and bi-cultural societies that do not assimilate are histories of turmoil, tension, and tragedy.' Canada, Belgium, Malaysia, and Lebanon all face crises of national existence in which minorities press for autonomy, if not independence. Pakistan and Cyprus have divided. Nigeria suppressed an ethnic rebellion. France faces difficulties with Basques, Bretons, and Corsicans."

2.) "Invent 'multiculturalism' and encourage immigrants to maintain their culture. I would make it an article of belief that all cultures are equal. That there are no cultural differences. I would make it an article of faith that the Black and Hispanic dropout rates are due solely to prejudice and discrimination by the majority. Every other explanation is out of bounds.

3.) "We could make the United States an 'Hispanic Quebec' without much effort. The key is to celebrate diversity rather than unity. As Benjamin Schwarz said in the Atlantic Monthly recently: 'The apparent success of our own multiethnic and multicultural experiment might have been achieved not by tolerance but by hegemony. Without the dominance that once dictated ethnocentricity and what it meant to be an American, we are left with only tolerance and pluralism to hold us together.' Lamm said, "I would encourage all immigrants to keep their own language and culture. I would replace the melting pot metaphor with the salad bowl metaphor. It is important to ensure that we have various cultural subgroups living in America enforcing their differences rather than as Americans, emphasizing their similarities."

4.) I would make our fastest growing demographic group the least educated. I would add a second underclass, unassimilated, undereducated, and antagonistic to our population. I would have this second underclass have a 50% dropout rate from high. school."

5.) Get big foundations and business to give these efforts lots of money. I would invest in ethnic identity, and I would establish the cult of 'Victimology.' I would get all minorities to think that their lack of success was the fault of the majority. I would start a grievance industry blaming all minority failure on the majority population."

6.) For America's downfall, include dual citizenship, and promote divided loyalties. I would celebrate diversity over unity. I would stress differences rather than similarities. Diverse people worldwide are mostly engaged in hating each other - that is, when they are not killing each other. A diverse, peaceful, or stable society is against most historical precedent. People undervalue the unity it takes to keep a nation together. Look at the ancient Greeks. The Greeks believed that they belonged to the same race; they possessed a common language and literature; and they worshipped the same gods. All Greece took part in the Olympic games. A common enemy, Persia, threatened their liberty. Yet all these bonds were not strong enough to overcome two factors: local patriotism and geographical conditions that nurtured political divisions. Greece fell. E. Pluribus Unum -- From many, one. In that historical reality, if we put the emphasis on the 'pluribus'. Instead of the 'Unum,' we will balkanize America as surely as Kosovo."

7.) I would place all subjects off limits; make it taboo to talk about anything against the cult of 'diversity.' I would find a word similar to 'heretic' in the 16th century - that stopped discussion and paralyzed thinking. Words like 'racist' or 'xenophobe' halt discussion and debate. Having made America a bilingual/bicultural country, having established multi-culturism, having the large foundations fund the doctrine of 'Victimology,' I would next make it impossible to enforce our immigration laws. I would develop a mantra: That because immigration has been good for America, it must always be good. I would make every individual immigrant symmetric and ignore the cumulative impact of millions of them."

2007-02-22 11:49:06 · answer #1 · answered by ♥ Scorpio X 3 · 0 0

There could be conflict if they dont mix well in the country, if they dont value school their children may be truant or get low grades, some people say they drive down wages because they are willing to work for low wages, they might cause crowding but more houses would be built, if the host country has a limited supply of water or energy immigrants would make things worse, if there is no screening of immigrants they might be criminals or have contagious diseases

2007-02-22 19:00:47 · answer #2 · answered by ali b 3 · 0 0

the immigrants home country looses some of its workforce. even if the immigrant sends money home it does not help in the long term to the countries economy.
people in the receiving country can be negative and suspicious which can lead to moral panic and racism.
migrant workers can easily be exploited.

2007-02-22 19:02:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

adding to the population of a country that's already overpopulated

2007-02-22 19:02:18 · answer #4 · answered by margarita 4 · 0 0

crime
segrigation
langauge break down,ie spending to much on translation when you could spend it on other things. iehealthcare or police.
missunderstandings.
there are millionsof things

2007-02-22 19:00:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

none.

2007-02-22 18:57:26 · answer #6 · answered by Mr Ed 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers