why is sex with my brother bad?

Question

my brother and i have been expermenting with sex since i was 16. why is it wrong if we love each other

Answer 1

YOU ARE A SICK PERSON AND NEED SERIOUS HELP. EWW YOU COMMITTED INCEST YOU CREEP. SEEK HELP PLEASE

Answer 2

You are not for real. Everyone knows the answer to this. O.K. basic stuff first. The genetic makeup of brother and sister is too close in the gene pool to produce a successful offspring. You need to get to at least a second cousin to be considered distant for the sake of making a baby. Birth defects could result from your continued contact. Be fair to the baby. Have some decency. Get a proper bf and a proper gf before you do the thing.

Answer 3

The majority of people are naturally repulsed by the thought of having sex with a sister or brother. I'm guessing this is a built it instinct because having children born from parents who are closely related can be deformed.

Answer 4

Yeah, honey, there's a difference between love of a brother tahn any other one (like having love for a friend). I don't know how you were raised and stuff, but that's wrong. Just imagine: you bioththave kids. They can be born with effects and what not. I suggest you stop this experimenting with your brother. Good Luck!

Answer 5

Although anthropologists have observed and studied violations of incest taboos (in other words, cases of incest), all anthropological theories of the incest taboo are concerned with the formal proscription against incest (as defined locally), not with actual cases of incest (however defined). These theories are motivated by two major questions: first, given the variation in how different societies define incest, and in which relationships are proscribed, is there any general pattern or universal function of incest taboos? Second, given that people do commit incest, why do so many (indeed, arguably, all) societies proscribe certain forms of incest? These questions are not concerned with the specific effects of incest on specific people — a matter usually left to psychologists.

One theory suggests that the taboo expresses a psychological revulsion that people naturally experience at the thought of incest. Most anthropologists reject this explanation, since incest does in fact occur. Alternatively, the taboo itself may be the cause of this psychological revulsion.

Another theory is that the observance of the taboo would lower the incidence of congenital birth defects caused by inbreeding. Anthropologists reject this explanation for two reasons. First, inbreeding does not directly lead to congenital birth defects per se; it leads to an increase in the frequency of homozygotes. A homozygote encoding a congenital birth defect will produce children with birth defects, but homozygotes that do not encode for congenital birth defects will decrease the number of carriers in a population. If children born with this type of heritable birth defect die (or are killed) before they reproduce, the ultimate effect of inbreeding will be to decrease the frequency of defective genes in the population. Second, anthropologists have pointed out that in the Trobriand case a man and the daughter of his father's sister, and a man and the daughter of his mother's sister, are equally distant genetically. Therefore, the prohibition against relations is not based on or motivated by concerns over biological closeness.

Finally, Claude Lévi-Strauss has argued that the incest taboo is in effect a prohibition against endogamy, and the effect is to encourage exogamy. Through exogamy, otherwise unrelated households or lineages will form relationships through marriage, thus strengthening social solidarity. Lévi-Strauss first exposed this Alliance theory in the Elementary Structures of Kinship (1949).

This theory was debated intensely by anthropologists in the 1950s. It appealed to many because it used the study of incest taboos and marriage to answer more fundamental research interests of anthropologists at the time: how can an anthropologist map out the social relationships within a given community, and how do these relationships promote or endanger social solidarity? Nevertheless, anthropologists never reached a consensus, and with the Vietnam War and the process of de-colonization in Africa, Asia, and Oceania, anthropological interests shifted away from mapping local social relationships

Answer 6

Just how old is your brother? How old are you?

You both need therapy pronto.....and if you are sexually abusing a younger sibling then you should be in a detention home or jail.

Answer 7

Oh my goodness, I hope you are kidding. Loving your brother is different from like loving someone who is not in your family, like a boyfriend or something. And it's just gross.

Answer 8

Not bad, but just frowned down upon society. Ever noticed that incest really isn't that popular and most people don't do it.

Answer 9

It is socially, physically, and emotionally unacceptable. Do you do it with your dad and animals, too? You give me the willies. Love has nothing to do with what you are doing. I think you're yankin' us.

Answer 10

i asked a question similar trying to provoke a reaction when i first started now i 'm kinda addicted to answering questions and building points

Answer 11

its bad because its incest....... this is VERY bad, you two better stop now and never ever talk to each other again, and hope word dosnt get out