I guess it depends on the experience and maturity of the person involved.
I should say that I grew up in a different time, and a different lifestyle than most of you. I learned to drive tractors on the farm, literally on my Grandfather's knee... I was driving on my own before I was eight years old. I had to stand up to see over the steering wheel. I got a learner's permit at 14, and my first driver's license at 15. By that time, I had been driving farm trucks and machinery for more than half my life! I drove my own car to High School Driver's Ed classes, just so I could get a discount on insurance.
Many teens today are mature and stable enough to be trusted behind the wheel of an automobile. Some are not...
Should the ones who can handle the task safely and need to drive to attend school, or help take care of siblings, or get to after-school jobs be penalized for the few immature children who go out and do stupid things?
2007-02-22 05:00:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by JetDoc 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
If the teenager demonstrates enough maturity he should be able to drive at 16. The driver licence though should be restricted for the safety of the teenager.
2007-02-22 04:48:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No I think they should raise the age to 18yrs old. There are so many accidents which involve 16 yr olds I feel they are just not mature enough I am not say all 16 yr old arent mature but alot of them are not they just dont pay attention they are just worried about how fast they can go and blowing there eardrums out with there stero systems
2007-02-22 04:46:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by linda h 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
im no longer 16 yet i nevertheless can not wait to get my drivers license! yet yea i do imagine they're too youthful, listed the following are some files to tutor it, yet regardless of this no longer all 16 year previous are undesirable drivers :] files on youngster utilizing and crashes — vehicle crashes are the best rationalization for death for American adolescents — more suitable than drugs, guns, or any affliction. — an adolescent’s first 500 miles of utilizing are the most threatening. throughout that factor, they’re 10 circumstances extra likely to crash than an individual. — In 2003 on my own, adolescents were keen about an anticipated million and a nil.5 injuries. — 2-thirds of the kids who died in vehicle injuries very last year were no longer buckled up. — in the course of the most modern-day 5 year era for which files are available in, virtually 35,000 human beings died at the same time as an adolescent became utilizing. — youngster drivers killed in motor vehicle collisions had a adolescents passenger interior the vehicle 40 5 % of the time. — for each 10 "close calls" in a vehicle, there’s one crash. — 16-year-olds crash at a fee that’s virtually one and a nil.5 circumstances as intense as 17-year-olds. — 15 to 20-year-olds make up 7 % of approved drivers, yet conflict through 14 % of fatalities and 20 % of all said collisions. — fifty 3 % of juvenile driver deaths take position on weekends. — on the inspiration of modern-day inhabitants traits, there'll be 23 % extra 16 to 20-year-previous drivers on the line in 2010 than there are at present — 26.a million million.
2016-12-04 19:20:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. I don't think they should anyway. My step sister was killed in a car crash at 16 when she was driving. In no way should children and that's what they are is children be able to drive that young. I'd bump it up to seventeen for permit and 18 for liscence.
2007-02-22 04:41:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Lola 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm 16 and I hate driving, personally.
2007-02-22 04:41:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by musiclover4life15 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, but it should be limited in a way that gradually increases their driving privilidges so that by the time they're 18, they can drive without restriction.
2007-02-22 04:42:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by eschampion 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only with parents or guardians for at least 1year.
2007-02-22 05:11:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by spawnsmama 2
·
0⤊
0⤋