Athaists, Holy Trinity exectly proofed? Dare refutes my proof???

Question

Exect rigorus prrofes of Holy Trinity.

* Start with the identity

− 20 = − 20

* Express both sides in slightly different, yet equivalent ways

25 − 45 = 16 − 36

* Factor both sides

5^2 - 5 \times 9 = 4^2 - 4 \times 9

* Add the same thing to both sides

5^2 - 5 \times 9 + \frac{81}{4} = 4^2 - 4 \times 9 + \frac{81}{4}

* Now factor both sides again

\left(5 - \frac{9}{2}\right)^2 = \left(4 - \frac{9}{2}\right)^2

* Square root both sides

5 - \frac{9}{2} = 4 - \frac{9}{2}

* Cancel the common term

5 = 4

Now,5-2=4-2
=>3=2-------------------------...

Now, * Let x and y be equal, non-zero quantities

x = y

* Add x to both sides

2x = x + y

* Take 2y from both sides

2x − 2y = x − y

* Factor out a two on the left side

2(x − y) = x − y

* Divide out (x − y)

2 = 1-------------(ii)
From, (i) and (ii) we gets,
3=1
Thus, Holy Trinity is proofes. Quesa Errata Demonstratum

Answer 1

It still doesn't make sense. There is no 3 in 1. That concept was invented at the Council of Nicea to bring the Hebrews and Greeks into Christianity.

Answer 2

This step is inaccurate: 5^2 - 5 cases 9 + frac{80 one}{4} = 4^2 - 4 cases 9 + frac{80 one}{4} * Now ingredient the two components lower back left(5 - frac{9}{2}suitable)^2 = left(4 - frac{9}{2}suitable)^2 there are not any person-friendly components. 2(x ? y) = x ? y * Divide out (x ? y) yet you defined x=y. So x-y =0 by potential of your definition. so which you assert that 0=0=2*0 Wow. flow lower back to center college, your math skills are lacking. QED.

Answer 3

> Thus, Holy Trinity is proofes. Quesa Errata Demonstratum

The proper Latin phrase to go with your "proofes" is Credo quia absurdum.

Answer 4

What the hell is \frac{81}{4} ??

Answer 5

Haha, we get this **** in the Math forum all the time.

Answer 6

I have no clue what you just did with all those numbers, but you are correct. The trinity is the TRUTH.