If the above question is correct then surely the only asylum seekers Great Britain should accept are those who fly directly in or those on ships which havn't docked since leaving the applicants country.
2007-02-22 02:27:58 · 13 answers · asked by plumbob 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
yes, but they all end up here with their hands out and the government lets them stay and pays them for doing fcuk all all day with the money meant for my pension. Now after fighting for my country and working all my life I have to pay for medical treatment and struggle to make ends meet every month
2007-02-22 03:06:42 · answer #1 · answered by vdv_desantnik 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Listen, they burnt down Yarlswood a few years ago, £30 000 000
worth of brand new state of the art detention centre, as they entered ports the goverment allowed immigration to count a family of up to10 people as one unit (1 person). Thats how criminalised this New Labour is as agoverment. The Charter of Human Rights states that a refugee can ask for asylum in the first country he/she arrives in after leaving their own country, Belgium and France have abused it by waving refugees through their border controls to Britain. Londonistan that way--->
2007-02-22 10:03:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes, that would make sense. Over here (the US) a judge who imprisoned some Iraqi 'asylum seekers' who were picked up as illegal immigrants pointed out in doubting their story that they had passed through 3 countries that had US Embassies yet hadn't applied.
I should think the same principle would apply in the UK.
2007-02-22 03:07:17 · answer #3 · answered by DAR 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
that is true,but always amazes me how they all end up in the UK....
maybe this has something to do with the FREE everything we give them..
bout time we started looking after our people properly,and getting this country back on its feet with a decent education system and a decent nhs,before we spend billions on immigrants and asylum seekers here for our education,housing,etc
2007-02-23 09:49:27 · answer #4 · answered by manchester_babe_30 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes.
i know this Albanian family who asked for asylum in the USA. most of the member got it, but a married couple who lived in Italy before moving to the USA. immigration rejected them because they should have asked for asylum in Italy. now they have to leave the USA.
2007-02-22 02:59:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is ment to work like that some go through france so if the very worst ever happend the would be kicked out of britain and just sent to france so they can sneak in again, airlines can be and are find for bringing them in so they try there hardest but it still happens then we let them stay,..
2007-02-22 04:01:44 · answer #6 · answered by comau20002000 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes they should. They don't. The law is a bag of shite. The immigrants have the upper hand at every turn. Immigration used to be a good job. Now it's a demoralising bag of crap and the public don't know the half of it.
2007-02-22 02:32:10 · answer #7 · answered by Frisky 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
if our goverment did its job that is the way it should work but we would rather screw our own people to appease the pc brigade. we should prosecute the whole damn goverment for failing in its duties ESPECIALY the trechourous mp George galloway ( he should be strung up or sent to guantanimo so the yanks can practice on him)
2007-02-22 12:37:09 · answer #8 · answered by mowhokman 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
your dead right but the other countrys dont want them so thay are passed to us (uk) as are stupid government dare not say piss off for fear of up setting the pc brigade also i belive this government wants slave labour
2007-02-22 05:24:26 · answer #9 · answered by mad keith 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
As far as I know that is true, but in reality that doesn't seem to be what happens.
2007-02-22 02:36:52 · answer #10 · answered by purplestar 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋