I'm for schools being run like corporations because of the serious lack of education that this country is recieving. Parents would have the option of which school to send their kids too and in turn provide competition between public schools to become better. If one school is becoming subpar they should be able to be taken over by a better school. This would create a need to provide a better education. And in a sense the parents would act as the shareholders. With this notion, the goal would not to make money but to provide students with education.
Here are some negative counterarguments I've heard:
Corruption, which happened with the No Child Left Behind Act. (Teachers passing students to meet requirements)
Leaving underprivileged children behind
Not providing adequate equipment
Corruption, while possible, is minimal. Equipment would be considered fixed assets, and leaving underpriveleged kids behind would be one standard of judging the schools performance.
2007-02-21
22:14:13
·
3 answers
·
asked by
zudomo
3
in
Education & Reference
➔ Other - Education