Of late, I've been taking a look at my Theodicy [for lack of a better word]. Essentially, it is written to not be such, but more as a defense of proper execution of the scientific method upon all faiths [As to find exactly what is found in them, as well as why not everyone is of the same variety, thusly it neither argues for existance or non-existance. for it to work, one must be impartial to learning everyone except one man or woman is living all wrong.]. After many readings of it, I've come to the conclusion that all Theists and Atheists are at fault for gross violation of the SM. Do you have any form of Theodicy, which is not slanted towards any faith, and if some who inspired your works? Mine is influenced by Lamarck and Charles Darwin.
And if you lack Theodicy, and reject it all, what is your stance of philosophy in the modern world?
2007-02-21 16:46:41 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Yes, yes I did. Hence the parenthetical note of, "For lack of a better word." If you'd like to give me a better word, I'd be happy.
2007-02-21 17:08:35 · update #1
Do you even know what a theodicy is?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodicy
2007-02-21 17:03:35 · answer #1 · answered by Aspurtaime Dog Sneeze 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Im completely slanted by sufi-buddhist-agnostic-realistic, democratic, universal values :D
so Ill just sit and watch this one ^^
2007-02-22 00:55:12 · answer #2 · answered by Antares 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋