i think they can basically just remove the ovary or ovaries (if it's in both) & then have her go through a little bit of chemo or radiation just in case. My grandma had uterine cancer & I know that's what they did for her....hysterectomy with some chemo or radiation & she was fine.
2007-02-21 13:54:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by §uper ®ose 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Ovarian cancer is cancer of the ovaries, the eggreleasing and hormone-producing organs of the female reproductive tract. Cancerous, or malignant, cells divide and multiply in an abnormal fashion
You have not told the other factors viz. general helth of the patient, grade and stage of the disease, age of the patient, these are required for assesment.
Treatment offered will primarily depend on the stage of the cancer and the woman's age. It is always appropriate to consider getting a second opinion, especially when treatment involves surgery, chemotherapy, and possible radiation. Before the patient makes her decision as to which course of treatment to take, she should feel that she has the information necessary with which to make an informed decision. The diagnostic tools mentioned above are used to determine the course of treatment. However, the treatment plan may need to be revised if the surgeon sees that the tumor has spread beyond the scope of what was seen during diagnostic tests.
If te disease is in primary stage - say Stage one it can be easily cured by sugery and chemo-radiation. If it is somewhat advnced say Stage II the overies can be removed and same chemo-ratiation be given. Any way the Oncologist on the spot is the best judge to evaluate the disease and give required treatment. Please act as per his advice with ut any hesitatina dn delay as CANCER IS STILL AN ANIGMA.-
2007-02-22 00:20:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Her prognosis will depend heavily on her over all health and what stage her cancer is in. Many people DO survive ovarian cancer. Try to help her through this scary time in her life. There is so much evidence that we (cancer patients) thrive in a positive environment and by keeping a positive attitude.
Best wishes to your aunt and family.
2007-02-22 00:32:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are more and more reports by establishment oncologists doubting the value of chemotherapy, even to the point of rejecting it outright. One of these, cancer biostatistician Dr. Ulrich Abel, of Heidelberg, Germany, issued a monograph titled Chemotherapy of Advanced Epithelial Cancer in 1990. Epithelial cancers comprise the most common forms of adenocarcinoma: lung, breast, prostate, colon, etc. After ten years as a statistician in clinical oncology, Abel became increasingly uneasy. "A sober and unprejudiced analysis of the literature," he wrote, "has rarely revealed any therapeutic success by the regimens in question in treating advanced epithelial cancer." While chemotherapy is being used more and more extensively, more than a million people die worldwide of these cancers annually - and a majority have received some form of chemotherapy before dying. Abel further concluded, after polling hundreds of cancer doctors, "The personal view of many oncologists seems to be in striking contrast to communications intended for the public." Abel cited studies that have shown "that many oncologists would not take chemotherapy themselves if they had cancer." (The Cancer Chronicles, December, 1990.)
"Even though toxic drugs often do effect a response, such as a partial or complete shrinkage of the tumor, this reduction does not prolong expected survival," Abel finds. "Sometimes, in fact, the cancer returns more aggressively than before, since the chemo fosters the growth of resistant cell lines." Besides, the chemo has severely damaged the body's own defenses, the immune system and often the kidneys as well as the liver.
In an especially dramatic table, Dr. Abel displays the results of chemotherapy in patients with various types of cancers, as the improvement of survival rates, compared to untreated patients. This table shows:
-In colorectal cancer: No evidence survival is improved.
-Gastric cancer: No clear evidence.
-Pancreatic cancer: Study completely negative. Longer survival in control (untreated) group.
-Bladder: No clinical trial done.
-Breast cancer: No direct evidence that chemotherapy prolongs survival; its use is "ethically questionable."
-Ovarian cancer: No direct evidence.
-Cervix and uterus: No improved survival.
-Head and neck: No survival benefit but occasional shrinkage of tumors.
2007-02-24 23:50:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dorothy and Toto 5
·
0⤊
0⤋