Global warming is the observed increase in the average temperature of the Earth's atmosphere and oceans in recent decades and its projected continuation. Models referenced by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) predict that global temperatures are likely to increase by 1.1 to 6.4 °C (2.0 to 11.5 °F) between 1990 and 2100.[1] The uncertainty in this range results from two factors: differing future greenhouse gas emission scenarios, and uncertainties regarding climate sensitivity.
Global average near-surface atmospheric temperature rose 0.6 ± 0.2 °Celsius (1.1 ± 0.4 °Fahrenheit) in the 20th century. The prevailing scientific opinion on climate change is that "most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations,"[1] which leads to warming of the surface and lower atmosphere by increasing the greenhouse effect. However, there remain respected scientists who hold differing opinions. Greenhouse gases are released by activities such as the burning of fossil fuels, land clearing, and agriculture. Other phenomena such as solar variation have had smaller but non-negligible effects on global temperature trends since 1950.[2]
An increase in global temperatures can in turn cause other changes, including a rising sea level and changes in the amount and pattern of precipitation. These changes may increase the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events, such as floods, droughts, heat waves, hurricanes, and tornados. Other consequences include higher or lower agricultural yields, glacier retreat, reduced summer streamflows, species extinctions and increases in the ranges of disease vectors. Warming is expected to affect the number and magnitude of these events; however, it is difficult to connect particular events to global warming. Although most studies focus on the period up to 2100, even if no further greenhouse gases were released after this date, warming (and sea level) would be expected to continue to rise for more than a millennium, since CO2 has a long average atmospheric lifetime.
Rent the movie "An inconvient Truth"
http://www.climatecrisis.net/
2007-02-21 08:14:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by redman 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
I see this question all the time, and every time I have to shake my head. I spent a whole semester learning the answer to this question, and I still probably don't know everything involved in the answer. Remember that there are scientists who have dedicated their entire lives to this field of study, so the least you could do is study some of their conclusions and ask less of a mouthfull next time.
In any case, the simplist answer would be that of all the causes that contribute to global warming, biproducts from the use of fossil fuel is by far the biggest contributer. If by "we" you mean human beings, then I will have to ask you if you know of any other creatures who use fossil fuels. If by "we" you mean Americans (I know you may not be asking from America, but I seem to see this question the most out of Americans, so forgive me for stereotyping), we are involved because we consume more fossile fuels than any other country in the world, with the exception, perhaps, of China, who's numbers are hard to verify.
There are many things one can do to help reduce human beings contribution to global warming, and it is hard to place more value on one than any of the others. The most obvious, of course, is to consume less and buy locally when and where you can, which, on the off chance that global warming turns out to be a bunch of nonsense (and keep in mind that all scientific evidence points towards that being a very, very slim chance), also saves you money, boosts your local economy and helps you live a healthier, longer life, among many other non environmental benefits. Why not do it just for your own sake?
If you would like to learn more, I would highly recommend checking out the Grist website (search for The Grist List and I'm sure you'll find it), they present some great scientific information in humorous, entertaining format that at the same time does not talk down to you. Also, you might be interested in checking out Sojourners magazine and their website. That is a Christian environmental organization I am very fond of.
You may also be interested in learning about the scientific theory developed by M. King Hubbert, a petrogeologist from Shell oil, of peak oil production, if you are on the global warming bandwagon. This subject is just as dire, if you ask me, and far less politically charged. In fact, it might be the solution to global warming, although that solution is not any prettier than the picture of all life on this planet burning up in UV rays!
Oh, and as for the person above me, I would suggest that he look up the word theory. Most people do not know what it actually means. It is not just a big word for idea. It is the closest thing to a fact we are capable of knowing. The only fact we know for certain is that there are exceptions to every 'fact'.
2007-02-21 08:26:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by kittiesandsparklelythings 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Global warming is the change in the earth's average temperature and should really be called climate change to speak accurately. To date, there is no proof whatsoever that man is related to climate change. At this point in time it is a theory that a lot of foolish people have managed to convince themselves is a fact. It is not a fact.
There is a lot of work to be done at this time but even the most rabid global warming advocates will not say with certainty that it is man caused. They express it as a probability because they don't know.
2007-02-21 08:18:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Greenhouse gases are gases that we need in order for Earth to be considered Earth. Alot of certain gases can cause Global Warming to get Worst
2007-02-21 13:45:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by Justin 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
why, why? i live in a town where it is freezing during the winter and this year it was really warm for winter. If we don't start acting on global warming now, then it will affect us later. Cows, cars and power plants are realizing gases into the air making it harmful, damaging the environment. instead of spending time asking a question like this, do some research and find out some answers, and don't forget to ask your science teacher.
2007-02-21 08:15:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Liz_Marie 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Global warming and greenhouse effect are the direct result of overuse of carbon-based fossil fuels like coal, oil, and natural gas.
The best way to cut back on these is to shop at your local farmer's market to avoid buying fruits and vegetables shipped halfway around the world using fossil fuels, to conserve energy and avoid using bottles and cans altogether.
2007-02-21 08:13:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by nora22000 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Plus Ãa (Climate) Change
The Earth was warming before global warming was cool.
BY PETE DU PONT
Wednesday, February 21, 2007 12:01 a.m. EST (Wall Street Journal Online)
When Eric the Red led the Norwegian Vikings to Greenland in the late 900s, it was an ice-free farm country--grass for sheep and cattle, open water for fishing, a livable climate--so good a colony that by 1100 there were 3,000 people living there. Then came the Ice Age. By 1400, average temperatures had declined by 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit, the glaciers had crushed southward across the farmlands and harbors, and the Vikings did not survive.
Such global temperature fluctuations are not surprising, for looking back in history we see a regular pattern of warming and cooling. From 200 B.C. to A.D. 600 saw the Roman Warming period; from 600 to 900, the cold period of the Dark Ages; from 900 to 1300 was the Medieval warming period; and 1300 to 1850, the Little Ice Age.
During the 20th century the earth did indeed warm--by 1 degree Fahrenheit. But a look at the data shows that within the century temperatures varied with time: from 1900 to 1910 the world cooled; from 1910 to 1940 it warmed; from 1940 to the late 1970s it cooled again, and since then it has been warming. Today our climate is 1/20th of a degree Fahrenheit warmer than it was in 2001.
Many things are contributing to such global temperature changes. Solar radiation is one. Sunspot activity has reached a thousand-year high, according to European astronomy institutions. Solar radiation is reducing Mars's southern icecap, which has been shrinking for three summers despite the absence of SUVS and coal-fired electrical plants anywhere on the Red Planet. Back on Earth, a NASA study reports that solar radiation has increased in each of the past two decades, and environmental scholar Bjorn Lomborg, citing a 1997 atmosphere-ocean general circulation model, observes that "the increase in direct solar irradiation over the past 30 years is responsible for about 40 percent of the observed global warming."
Statistics suggest that while there has indeed been a slight warming in the past century, much of it was neither human-induced nor geographically uniform. Half of the past century's warming occurred before 1940, when the human population and its industrial base were far smaller than now. And while global temperatures are now slightly up, in some areas they are dramatically down. According to "Climate Change and Its Impacts," a study published last spring by the National Center for Policy Analysis, the ice mass in Greenland has grown, and "average summer temperatures at the summit of the Greenland ice sheet have decreased 4 degrees Fahrenheit per decade since the late 1980s." British environmental analyst Lord Christopher Monckton says that from 1993 through 2003 the Greenland ice sheet "grew an average extra thickness of 2 inches a year," and that in the past 30 years the mass of the Antarctic ice sheet has grown as well.
Earlier this month the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released a summary of its fourth five-year report. Although the full report won't be out until May, the summary has reinvigorated the global warming discussion.
While global warming alarmism has become a daily American press feature, the IPCC, in its new report, is backtracking on its warming predictions. While Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" warns of up to 20 feet of sea-level increase, the IPCC has halved its estimate of the rise in sea level by the end of this century, to 17 inches from 36. It has reduced its estimate of the impact of global greenhouse-gas emissions on global climate by more than one-third, because, it says, pollutant particles reflect sunlight back into space and this has a cooling effect.
The IPCC confirms its 2001 conclusion that global warming will have little effect on the number of typhoons or hurricanes the world will experience, but it does not note that there has been a steady decrease in the number of global hurricane days since 1970--from 600 to 400 days, according to Georgia Tech atmospheric scientist Peter Webster.
The IPCC does not explain why from 1940 to 1975, while carbon dioxide emissions were rising, global temperatures were falling, nor does it admit that its 2001 "hockey stick" graph showing a dramatic temperature increase beginning in 1970s had omitted the Little Ice Age and Medieval Warming temperature changes, apparently in order to make the new global warming increases appear more dramatic.
Sometimes the consequences of bad science can be serious. In a 2000 issue of Nature Medicine magazine, four international scientists observed that "in less than two decades, spraying of houses with DDT reduced Sri Lanka's malaria burden from 2.8 million cases and 7,000 deaths [in 1948] to 17 cases and no deaths" in 1963. Then came Rachel Carson's book "Silent Spring," invigorating environmentalism and leading to outright bans of DDT in some countries. When Sri Lanka ended the use of DDT in 1968, instead of 17 malaria cases it had 480,000.
Yet the Sierra Club in 1971 demanded "a ban, not just a curb," on the use of DDT "even in the tropical countries where DDT has kept malaria under control." International environmental controls were more important than the lives of human beings. For more than three decades this view prevailed, until the restrictions were finally lifted last September.
As we have seen since the beginning of time, and from the Vikings' experience in Greenland, our world experiences cyclical climate changes. America needs to understand clearly what is happening and why before we sign onto U.N. environmental agreements, shut down our industries and power plants, and limit our economic growth.
Mr. du Pont, a former governor of Delaware, is chairman of the Dallas-based National Center for Policy Analysis. His column appears once a month.
2007-02-21 09:04:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Flyboy 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
because humans are responsible for many effects
Man has practically custom made the climate we have today
in the dinosaurs days there were no desserts and just about all desserts are a result of mans interventions
ghengas Khan burned all the forrests and filled the wells with sand turning huge teritories into desserts
the phoenician fleet deforested Lebanon and created those desserts ,Spain was deforreseted for building the Armada
and the Sahara used to be forrests ,until a n ancient civilization opit an end to that
now it is like a fire growing by 7 kilometres a year the heat consuming the plant growth on the edges.
collectively all of this has had a huge impact on gobal cilmate ,
but this is nothing compared to the effects of the expanding irrisponsible modern agriculture
Is global warming a man-made menace?
not all there are natural cycles in the planets life
but a lot is influenced by mans existance ,and this is increasing with overpopulation,putting strains on Natural resources and increasing contaminations as well as destructions of essential componants the ensure living conditions for all life forms
some home truths
politicians and scientists who work for politicians have downplayed the facts because solutions are expensive and means change and change effects many people income,and most of the world is kept in the dark of the real things that are going on.
in North Africa,India,Mexico ,millions of people are effected by land loss and desertification
in recent times thousands of people have died because of exessive heat,usually old people.in India ,Mexico and France,
deforestation causing desertification,the desert conditions causing very cold nights and scorching hot days
in china, thousands of what used to be farmers are running for their lives from the dust storms that have burried their towns and turned their lands into dessert,the globe where they were got to hot for them .
and instead of producing food they are now needing it from some where else,and they will drastically effect the world food prices when they start buying water in the form of grains ,at any cost destabalising governments, in some countries ,could be the result
(are you seeing more Chinese around interested in agricultural lands ,we do here in Mexico)
,the Sahara is growing by 7 kilometers a year
and all of the desserts we know are a results of mans actions ,and they are increasing ,not getting less ,in the dinosaurs days ,there were no desserts.
collectively this planet is drying up because of bad farming practices like,over grazing and fertilizers,
as far as the food production is concerned, Global warming or some of its effects are serious,rising seas result in landloss
each degree rise in temperature means 10%crop loss
more landloss because of desertification every year,we have less areble land to produce food ,for an extra 70 million people ,
and there is less and less water (because of deforestation),to irrigate this production ,
and there are less and less farmers to do it..
who are overpumping deep carbon aquifiers
who are plowing more and more unstable lands because they have lost so many million hectares to desertification ,
because of bad farming practises ,such as using fertilizers and heavy machinary or over grazing
RISING SEAS
The northpole is melting ,and we will know it without ice in our life times.
this does not affect the sea level because it is ice that is already in the water.but the melting ice from Green land and the south pole ,are another matter.
Global warming is in theory reversable,but it will mean global co operation between all countries ,and taking into account human nature and the world politics ,it is unlikely that this will happen,
At least not untill we are all in the middle of planetary disastres and it becomes a battle for the survival of humanity every where.
SOLUTIONS
if you want to help the planet ,plant a tree every week ,if everyone on the planet did we we would be able to reverse the destructive processes
reduce carbon emisions,and they are already working on that by alternative forms of energy and regulations on carbon producing materials,aerosol cans,burning rubbish,industrial chimneys,powerplants etc.
the capture of carbon and the production of water and assist the aquiferous manta.
the world bank pays large subsidies for reforrestation to capture carbon and the best tree for this is the Pawlonia
Waterharvesting projects ,such as millions of small dams.to redirect over ground waterflows from the rains into the ground to supply subteranian water supplies.
the protection of existing forrests.
stop building more highways,urban planning to include vegetation stop building cities encourage people to return to the land to conduct their business from there which now has become possible thanks to the internet.
education to motivate people to auto sufficiency by building more home food gardens.
education on environmental awareness
education on family planning to curb over´populaion
Agricultural education and improvements to follow the principals or sustainability and soil management.
more environmental or land ,design to prevent bush fires,such as--fire breaks
,more dams.regulations and control for public behaviour
alternative effeciant public transport to discourage the use of the internal conbustion engine
recicling wastes,limit water use
i am a Permaculture Consultant for the department of Ecology for the regional government in Guerrero Mexico
http://spaces.msn.com/byderule
Source(s) Lester E Brown is the director and founder of the global institute of Environment in the United states .he has compiled a report based on all the satalite information available from NASA,and all the information that has
come from Universities and American embassies WORLD WIDE ,
his little book--a planet under stress , Plan B has been trans lated into 50 languages and won the best book award in 2003.
2007-02-22 17:49:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋