Pan gendered: Is this a rill condition like being Gay.?

Answer 1

Nearly every species on the planet exhibits homosexual behavior in a certain, constant number of thier population. I'm not sure how mosquitoes or fish 'learned' it. Little tiny doms with whips? Maybe they have crossdressers, too...

According to sexual anthropologists and gender studies, gender role is an assumed set of tasks, abilities, responsibilties, and other cultural conceptions of behavoir. There are two gender roles in Western culture: male and female. There are more in others, such as the native North American Squaw man (which is a poor translation). Sex is a born thing, with primary and secondary physical characteristics. There are three or four sexes, depending on who you talk to and how they count it: male, female, androgynous, and psuedo-androgynous, meaning that they look like male or female, but have the hormones and genetics of both. This makes a big difference in thier reactions, body development, and preferences. Esp. if they are reassigned. Yes. Androgynous is a real human sex. About one percent of the human population is born true androgynous. It is not a freak, or something to be assigned. It is a totally valid born sex, even if Western culture has no place for it. Other cultures have gods in that image. It wasn't their imagination.

Gender is a sexual identity, gender role programming, and how sexuality is experienced. It may or may not correspond to born sex. There are five human genders: male, female, male to female trans, female to male trans, and androgynous, which is very rare. A male to female trans has a completely different life experience, even in a female gender role, than a born woman does. And born androgynous are almost always assigned a gender role at birth, and operated on, even if the parents chose incorrectly, and the child must be reassigned later in life, instead of simply allowing them to experience the validity of androgyny. Most who care to share are pretty bitter about that.

Humans are not swans or wolves. Not only are we one of the only species with full time sexuality, but we are social animals who do not mate for life. If we did, we wouldn't need laws to maintain those relationships. We aren't very strong, or fast, or have natural armour... We are weak, useless creatures. Except for our opposable thumbs, and our brains, and our ability to communicate with others of our species. We have survived entirely due to internal co-operation, despite what modern Darwinistic capitalism wants you to believe. If we genetically were programed to fight with each other, none of us would be here now. We are very good at making things dead and blown up. But luckily, we are hard-wired to work together and to bond with as many humans as possible. We know personal relationships define our happiness (we seek desperatly hard to find them) and the meaning of our life in the world is defined by how useful we think we are or have been to others. We are programmed to make love, not war.

Therefore, Pan sexuality seems to be the most common form in humans. We do anything to anything, as a general rule, and want to love as many ppl as applicable. There are lots of colours. My preference is for black and green. I don't care for orange. Is that a learned behavour? Is that biochemical? Is it genetic? Is there something wrong with me if I don't like orange? Must I be reprogrammed to love it and paint my walls with it, even if I'm blissfully happy without it?

My husband does not prefer men, but he wouldn't rule one out if the perfect one showed up. My wife perfers men, but is far more inclined to some good women. Obviously... Her daughter is a dyke. She's 7, and we can already tell. There is no question. We can even see, by her preferences, what kind of dyke she will probably be. My daughter is 5, and a female gender role for the most part, and happy in it. They want to grow up and get married. Why would I try to reprogram either of them? It will only make them unhappy, and they will have to hide thier real feelings from me, possibly forever. And I would deserve it...

Humans are the most complex in thier sexuality than anything else on the planet, due to our constant 'heat', our great big brains, and our social needs. Pan is always the start, but our life maps and our genetics determine our preferences, and our dislikes. Trying to even understand someone elses' is impossible, but empathy is always encouraged, and acceptance is required.

Answer 2

For one thing sexuality is rushes of blood and erections while gender is behaviours, customs and the way people move their body. Gender is more social and less physical. Few feminists think they can think a beard onto their face but do think that they can work or take part in competitive sports i.e. a divide between the social and physical. This seems to be vindicated by the fact that gay men can exhibit either behaviours, customs or body movements as camp or straight acting inspite of the goings on in their pants. Another thing is the fact that homosexuality is so universal(even repressive countries like Iran) which working women,and home caring ones are not and are not even homogeneous. Edit. Whatever about the possible physical affects of brain on gender the point I was making is that an erection is a singular response to a stimulus while customs, roles and body language are a mesh of responses: They are a bundle of traits. Some which clearly don't add up. For example women are meant to be communicators which is essential in sports that need co-op sports and politics. But their is paucity of participation in both. Co-op Sports in itself is a bundle of traits, its not only being aggressive, but co-operative and communicative. So even if you could say that aggression(like sexuality) was biologically determined you certainly couldn't say that gender roles/gender or sport as a whole were. Theres definitely a clear cut qualitative leap there.

Answer 3

Pan gendered isn't gay. There is a difference but it takes a lot of explaining. If you are really interested do a search using "pan gender" and you'll get lots of in depth info.

Answer 4

I don't consider being gay a "condition". That's rill.

Answer 5

Being gay isn't a choice.

Answer 6

BEING GAY ISN'T A CONDITION....ITS A PERSONAL LIFESTYLE CHOICE!!!!!!