2007-02-21 03:58:03 · 9 answers · asked by Prathamesh 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
No, all that India needs to be a superpower is that the educated people like you and me should understand our responsibility well and contribute to its prosperity by our deeds. Had we been realising this since we got freedom the scenario would have been quite different. We call names to the politicians and say damn things about them and escape even the most important role to be played as a citizen of a democracy - VOTING - just on the pretext that all the politicians are the same and we will not vote to any. While saying so we do not realise that this is our vote which could make the difference because we will always be shosing a lesser evil, even if the assumption of all the politicians being evil is correct. If we would be chosing the least evil since our independence the best eveil would have come out by now to rule the country. This is we who waste most of the precious resources of the country which are not in abundance and leave the weaker section deprived of, for instance, drinking water, electricity, cooking gas, fuel etc. etc. The bold and clear question infront of we the intelect and educated people is WHO GETS DIRTY TO CLEAN THE HOUSE OF OUR OWN. In fact the weaker and uneducated section of our society is not even aware of the responsibilities of a responsible citizen. So how can we expect him to have less children and not increase the already burgeoning population of the country. Again this is we who can educate them at least as much as it is necessary to read and write. Do we not encounter in our every day life at least one such illiterate person who comes across our routine life and we can educate him/her?
2007-02-21 04:32:22 · answer #1 · answered by ABY 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
look what got here approximately to Iraq. it quite is a worthwhile place to be the top of a rustic and make despite rules however the outcomes could nicely be quite risky. for my section, dictators do not final long (i.e. Hitler, Mussuloni, Saddam, and at modern-day the top of Korea who's finding out Nuclear weapons) and the country do not make any progression in any container. If there replaced into dictator rule in India, then there could have been no progression what so ever. All Indians could have been taken care of as slaves via the dictator and no you will have any "say" in any subject.
2016-12-17 15:23:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
naaaa. India is a Democrat country which means the public elects one man and he decides the stuff for the country and if the man is up to no good he gets fired and Dictators make life hell look at Julius cease and Saddam Hussein. And even if there is a dictator the public wont agree on his decisions and there will be a civil war . innit
hope that helps
cool kid in country
2007-02-21 04:08:02 · answer #3 · answered by abbas m 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i believe there is no need for a dictator,not even for a single year...if we have a cabinet of ministers,on whom we have trust and faith...wat at all india needs is to become a super power in the near future,we can achieve this goal if our ministers work hard on this issue rather than blaming the opposition party...it may sound strange but i have been hearing for the past ten years tht india is a developing country and i still donnno when will be india called a developed country...i believe people who are focused to make India a super power should have the determination...politician is not at all a bad career...India should take its own decision rather than asking America for help...INDIA HAS ALREADY DONE ITS MISTAKE BY VOTING AGAINST IRAN,JUST TO IMPRESS AMERICA THINKING AMERICA WILL SUPPLY ARMS EQUIPMENT TO INDIA...just imagine India is planning to buy f-16's hornet from America when America is working on building a f-22...buying used war equipment?????politician rather then being under pressure should work hard on it's future....liked this one...?????let me know...mohammed_ahmed121@yahoo.co.in
2007-02-23 03:04:01 · answer #4 · answered by momen 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Dictators are not going to make any country superpower. They will make the life of their citizens in hell.
2007-02-21 04:02:37 · answer #5 · answered by Expression 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
One dictator can not manage and he will go mad. So a bunch of dictators elected by the public are looting and blaming each other.
2007-02-21 10:34:09 · answer #6 · answered by liketoaskq 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
prathamesh,
I am not totally against dictatorship.but still I feel India being a democracy is good.We cannot trust who so ever shall be the dictator.they wont care for the people infact they will make their own life more luxuries and turn ours into hell.he will exercise more power and take less responsibility
2007-02-21 16:36:14 · answer #7 · answered by Suraj 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
YA !!!!offcourse without dictatorship people here can't understand the meaning of RULES!!!!
2007-02-21 04:19:50 · answer #8 · answered by sweet bhullar 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No Sir, a democrate is always the best.
2007-02-21 16:14:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋