English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

"Monday's New York Times features a front page article on a paleontologist/creationist who believes that the earth is "at most 10,000 years old." This is about Dr. Marcus Ross.

That's one and it took less than 10 seconds to find.

2007-02-21 01:06:16 · answer #1 · answered by cmw 6 · 0 1

Creationist Paleontologist: Dr. Kurt Wise
Come on you kids go to school or get back to your homeschooling. You people need to use Yahoo search or google search or cha cha search with a live guide and get some real answers. Search for forums for evolution and get in one. You sound stupid and shame those who have a thought! I am talking to the people with stupid answers, you know who you are.

2007-02-21 09:04:21 · answer #2 · answered by infocom 2 · 1 0

I am not a creationist; rather I believe the creation account as related in Genesis. Furthermore, I cannot name one. However, this may be of interest:

Some evolutionists claim that evolution is “one hundred percent” believable and that it is “a theory one can verify in a laboratory.” But at the Second International Congress of Human Paleontology, held at Turin, Italy in 1987 or 1988, it was clear that many scientists still have misgivings on the matter.

Instead of confirming that evolution is “one hundred percent” believable, the congress apparently exposed major differences of opinion between scientists over when and how man evolved. Paleontologist Bernard Vandermeersch, for example, underscored the fact that, as far as man’s origins are concerned, the results of paleontology “contradict the data furnished by genetics,” which point to one common ancestor.

However, such contradictions exist only among persons who fail to accept the simple truth that God “made out of one man every nation of men, to dwell upon the entire surface of the earth.” (Acts 17:26) How did he do so? Genesis 2:7 tells us that “God proceeded to form the man out of dust from the ground and to blow into his nostrils the breath of life,” causing man to become “a living soul.”

Not surprisingly, biologist Giuseppe Sermonti, commenting on the conclusions of the congress, conceded that “all attempts to get us to descend from the trees of the apes have produced no interesting results. The first man was a man.”

DID YOU CATCH THESE KEY POINTS?
"As far as man’s origins are concerned, the results of paleontology “contradict the data furnished by genetics,” which point to one common ancestor."

AND
“all attempts to get us to descend from the trees of the apes have produced no interesting results. The first man was a man.”

2007-02-21 09:20:24 · answer #3 · answered by Abdijah 7 · 0 2

To bad money has not been put up for this easy task:

Dr. Kurt Wise’s doctoral degree in palaeontology was completed at Harvard under Professor Stephen Jay Gould. (http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/313.asp)

Creationist molecular biologist
and microbiologist:
Dr Ian Macreadie

http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/bios/i_macreadie.asp

If you want to look up more visit the links.

2007-02-21 09:05:58 · answer #4 · answered by Solafide55 2 · 2 0

Or failing that a biologist who questions evolution of species. I guarantee you'll get a list of scientists but none of them will be qualified paleontologists or biologists.


Edit- One of the answers below mentions Hovind. Somebody shoot me.

2007-02-21 09:00:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

I do believe in creationism....but I don't know any paleontologists...sorry.

2007-02-21 09:10:37 · answer #6 · answered by daljack -a girl 7 · 0 0

They'll give you names. Most of them won't exist though, and the rest won't have any accepted qualifications.

Atheism. You know it makes sense.

Well, I did say so didn't I. The only one named so far who has any credentials whatsoever is Dr Colin Paterson, and they use a quote that has been twisted to mean completely the opposite of what he actually says. Typical fundie logic. If you can't prove your ideas with facts, then lie, lie and lie some more.

2007-02-21 09:03:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

you'll get a long list from the creationist institute.

here's how to analyze it when it gets posted:
1. weed out all the people who are in completely unrelated fields. that knocks out half to three quarters
2. do a google search for diploma mills or christian colleges. cross reference. that will eliminate about a third of the remainder
3. check the 'net for peer reviewed articles for any of those remaining. you won't find any.

that's all!

2007-02-21 09:05:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

There is a whole slew of noted palentologists to choose from! Dr Dwayne Gish, Michael and Beverly Oard, Gloria Clanin,Lloyd R. Hight and Ken Ham...

2007-02-21 09:07:08 · answer #9 · answered by Stormchaser 5 · 0 2

I would but I don't waste my time on things like that I am too busy worshiping God. I honestly don't know what that word paleontologist is and don't have time to look it up. I will just assume it is some kind of scientist. Darwin himself denounced all of his theories and accepted Jesus as his savior near the end of his life. The bible says "every knee shall bow".

2007-02-21 09:04:43 · answer #10 · answered by t2ensie 3 · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers