What do you think about Australia announcing it will ban incandescent light bulbs?

Question

Within the next three years all incandescent light bulbs in Australia will be replaced with energy saving bulbs, which use 80% less electricity.

The Australian government is the only western nation (besides the USA) which refused to ratify the Kyoto Protocol. Is this latest idea, although a good idea, too little too late?

Answer 1

Finaly someone who is doing something about it... Austrailia is setting a president that I hope many others will follow. CFL's are a good start. Alternative energy research is next step. Don't stop now Aussies your on a roll. Come on Fellow Americans Get with the program... Tell our government you want eco-responsibility. In closing OOHRA!!

Answer 2

There are many various uses of incandescent light bulbs besides home lighting. Many have limited use such as movie projectors and require special sockets. While a total ban is probably not feasible, wide use of non-incandescent bulbs will save much energy and air pollution resulting from energy production. Certain low-watt bulbs can not be used in confined spaces due to overheating and possible shortened life or even fire. In the winter incandescent lights help heat a home (one KW of heat is the same whether produced by an electric heater or ten 100 watt bulbs) and savings may not accrue unless electric heating of homes is also banned. Politicians must consult with scientists and engineers to reach a proper balance with maximum real savings.

Answer 3

That is just window dressing and not a good idea anyway. The real reason Australia has one of the highest per capita carbon emission rates is due to heavy reliance on coal. Using coal to generate power puts out more carbon that oil and much more than natural gas, so switching to oil, gas or even nuclear would be a much more effective step. And people in a free economy will choose energy saving bulbs if it makes sense, because it saves money. It is communism to force them all to switch, even in cases where it doesn't make sense, and there are cases where it doesn't. Kind of like the Khmer Rouge making the people dig irrigation canals that ran up hill because some party official though it was a shorter route.

Answer 4

No. on a similar time as they use much less electrical energy, they do could heat up earlier getting finished gentle output. And please do no longer forget approximately the female interior the North East who's daughter broke one. She knew that they contained mercury, approximately 3 grams, so she inquired to many diverse supplies on how superb to bathe it up. the respond she finally have been given from her state's D.E.P. became that it would fee some thing like $2500.00, via fact it became seen a unsafe spill. on a similar time as I doubt that many could be silly adequate to take it as a techniques a she did, it rather is what's called an unintentional effect. i exploit those bulbs for some purposes that they are large for, mutually with artwork lights and lamps that I flow away on for prolonged sessions. yet for many makes use of they actually don't extra healthful properly. permit the unfastened marketplace determine what bulbs to apply, no longer some brainless bureaucrat. one extra strike, there are none made interior the U.S., they are all made in China.

Answer 5

A bit strange since Australia, just as the US, refuses to adher to, and sign the Kyoto accords.

But - as is the case in Europe - for the people it wouldn`t make a difference, for the energy companies will raise the price to compensate for the drop in use.

Answer 6

I can see it happening. In the US, California and New Jersey both have bills going through their assembly to ban the bulbs. It will cause a major problem for people with fixtures that cannot use fluorescent bulbs.

Answer 7

Australia has always been a little dim. No reason to stop now. Unfortunatley, 20 years from now the results of their big idea will be so insignificant as to not even be measurable.