The Talmud and the Torah are not the same thing. The Torah includes Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. The Talmud is a commentary on the Torah; a full set of the Talmud would be about three times the size of an old-fashioned encyclopedia - about 70 full-sized volumes in Hebrew and Aramaic. The Jewish "holy book" is the Tanakh, from which many books of the "old" testament originally came; it includes the Torah (the books mentioned above), the prophets (such as the book of Isaiah), and the "writings", which are sort of a miscellaneous group of books such as Ruth, Esther, the Song of Solomon, and quite a few others.
2007-02-20 22:18:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
complicated yet exciting q i'm going to objective to respond to so a techniques as i'm able to. The Quran consists of an excellent sort of comments taken from the Bible, or a minimum of, taken from the thoughts circulating interior the close to East at that ingredient. (yet, NB, a Moslem can not believe this - to a Moslem, the Quran is the transcript of an unique saved in heaven, and can't have any human precursors) The Quran is an unsystematic expounding of an relatively systematic faith. the various suras are arranged in descending order of length (interestingly, approximately the different order from that wherein they have been composed). in assessment, the Bible has a commencing up, center and end. Of the Talmud, enable a Jew answer. i don't be attentive to.
2016-10-02 11:59:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by missildine 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
the Torah was revealed first. Jews follow it. Jews went away from the Straight Path (also changed/revised the Torah... so its not the Word of God anymore), so Jesus came to correct their path and make them righteous again.
Christians changed/revised the Gospel so much that an original does not exist anymore. the Bible is far from being the "Word" of God.
Muhammad was sent to guide all of mankind. the Quran was revealed to Muhammad, his followers wrote it down (because he was illiterate.. could not read or write). praises to God, the Quran still remains intact word by word and can be credited as the "Word of God"
2007-02-20 22:40:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by XB 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
The Quran is quite different from the Bible and the Talmud, which are more similar to each other.
2007-02-20 22:16:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
SIMILARITIES IN THE QUR’AN AND THE BIBLE DUE TO COMMON SOURCE
Similarities between the Qur’an and the Bible does not necessarily mean that the former has been copied from the latter. In fact it gives evidence that both of them are based on a common third source; all divine revelations came from the same source - the one universal God. No matter what human changes were introduced into some of these Judeo-Christian and other older religious scriptures that had distorted their originality, there are some areas that have remained free from distortion and thus are common to many religions.
It is true that there are some similar parallels between the Qur’an and the Bible but this is not sufficient to accuse Muhummad (pbuh) of compiling or copying from the Bible. The same logic would then also be applicable to teachings of Christianity and Judaism and thus one could wrongly claim that Jesus (pbuh) was not a genuine Prophet (God forbid) and that he simply copied from the Old Testament.
The similarities between the two signify a common source that is one true God and the continuation of the basic message of monotheism and not that the later prophets have plagiarised from the previous prophets.
If someone copies during an examination he will surely not write in the answer sheet that he has copied from his neighbour or Mr. XYZ. Prophet Muhummad (pbuh) gave due respect and credit to all the previous prophets (pbut). The Qur’an also mentions the various revelations given by Almighty God to different prophets.
MUSLIMS BELIEVE IN THE TAURAH, ZABOOR, INJEEL AND QUR’AN
Four revelations of Allah (swt) are mentioned by name in the Qur’an: the Taurah, the Zaboor, the Injeel and the Qur’an.
Taurah, the revelation i.e. the Wahi given to Moosa (a. s.) i.e. Moses (pbuh).
Zaboor, the revelation i.e. the Wahi given to Dawood (a.s.) i.e. David (pbuh).
Injeel, the revelation i.e. the Wahi given to Isa (A.S.) ie. Jesus (pbuh).
‘Al-Qur’an’, the last and final Wahi i.e. revelation given to the last and final Messenger Muhammad (pbuh).
It is an article of faith for every Muslim to believe in all the Prophets of God and all revelations of God. However, the present day Bible has the first five books of the Old Testament attributed to Moses and the Psalms attributed to David. Moreover the New Testament or the four Gospels of the New Testament are not the Taurah, the Zaboor or the Injeel, which the Qur’an refers to. These books of the present day Bible may partly contain the word of God but these books are certainly not the exact, accurate and complete revelations given to the prophets.
The Qur’an presents all the different prophets of Allah as belonging to one single brotherhood; all had a similar prophetic mission and the same basic message. Because of this, the fundamental teachings of the major faiths cannot be contradictory, even if there has been a considerable passage of time between the different prophetic missions, because the source of these missions was one: Almighty God, Allah. This is why the Qur’an says that the differences which exist between various religions are not the responsibility of the prophets, but of the followers of these prophets who forgot part of what they had been taught, and furthermore, misinterpreted and changed the scriptures. The Qur’an cannot therefore be seen as a scripture which competes with the teachings of Moses, Jesus and the other prophets. On the contrary, it confirms, completes and perfects the messages that they brought to their people.
Another name for the Qur’an is the ‘The Furqan’ which means the criteria to judge the right from the wrong, and it is on the basis of the Qur’an that we can decipher which part of the previous scriptures can be considered to be the word of God.
SCIENTIFIC COMPARISON BETWEEN QUR’AN AND BIBLE
If you glance through the Bible and the Qur’an you may find several points which appear to be exactly the same in both of them, but when you analyse them closely, you realise that there is a difference of ‘chalk and cheese’ between them. Only based on historical details it is difficult for someone who is neither conversant with Christianity or Islam to come to a firm decision as to which of the scriptures is true; however if you verify the relevant passages of both the scriptures against scientific knowledge, you will yourself realize the truth.
Creation of the Universe in Six Days
As per the Bible, in the first book of Genesis in Chapter One, the universe was created in six days and each day is defined as a twenty-four hours period. Even though the Qur’an mentions that the universe was created in six ‘Ayyaams’, ‘Ayyaam’ is the plural of years; this word has two meanings: firstly, it means a standard twenty-four hours period i.e. a day, and secondly, it also means stage, period or epoch which is a very long period of time.
When the Qur’an mentions that the universe was created in six ‘Ayyaams’, it refers to the creation of the heavens and the earth in six long periods or epochs; scientists have no objection to this statement. The creation of the universe has taken billions of years, which proves false or contradicts the concept of the Bible which states that the creation of the Universe took six days of twenty-four hour durations each.
Sun Created After the Day
The Bible says in chapter 1, verses 3-5, of Genesis that the phenomenon of day and night was created on the first day of creation of the Universe by God. The light circulating in the universe is the result of a complex reaction in the stars; these stars were created according to the Bible (Genesis chapter 1 verse 14 to 19) on the fourth day. It is illogical to mention the result that is the light (the phenomenon of day and night) was created on the first day of Creation when the cause or source of the light was created three days later. Moreover the existence of evening and morning as elements of a single day is only conceivable after the creation of the earth and its rotation around the sun. In contrast with the contents of the Bible on this issue, the Qur’an does not give any unscientific sequence of Creation. Hence it is absolutely absurd to say that Prophet Muhummad (pbuh) copied the passages pertaining to the creation of the universe from the Bible but missed out this illogical and fantastic sequence of the Bible.
Creation of the Sun, The Earth and the Moon
According to the Bible, Book of Genesis, chapter 1, verses 9 to 13, the earth was created on the third day, and as per verses 14 to 19, the sun and the moon were created on the fourth day. The earth and the moon emanated, as we know, from their original star, the Sun. Hence to place the creation of the sun and the moon after the creation of the earth is contrary to the established idea about the formation of the solar system.
Vegetation Created on the third day and Sun on the fourth day
According to the Bible, Book of Genesis, chapter 1, verses 11-13, vegetation was created on the third day along with seed-bearing grasses, plants and trees; and further on as per verses 14-19, the sun was created on the fourth day. How is it scientifically possible for the vegetation to have appeared without the presence of the sun, as has been stated in the Bible?
If Prophet Muhummad (pbuh) was indeed the author of the Qur’an and had copied its contents from the Bible, how did he manage to avoid the factual errors that the Bible contains? The Qur’an does not contain any statements which are incompatible with scientific facts.
The Sun and the Moon both Emit light
According to the Bible both the sun and the moon emit their own light. In the Book of Genesis, chapter 1, verse 16 says, "And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night".
Science tells us today that the moon does not have its own light. This confirms the Qur’anic concept that the light of the moon is a reflected light. To think that 1400 years ago, Prophet Muhummad (pbuh) corrected these scientific errors in the Bible and then copied such corrected passages in the Qur’an is to think of something impossible.
2007-02-20 22:20:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by PeaceKeeper 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
They three have very few similarities, not even in writing styles.
Pretty much the only thing they have in common is the mention of God by name.
2007-02-20 22:16:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
if all three contain info regarding the old testament ,then , in the name of religious believes , Christianity is the winner!
2007-02-20 22:27:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
According to Islam, there are four books. Zabur, Taurat(Torah), Injil(Bible) and the Qu'ran.
May I compare all these to the beams of light from three differents hole from the ceiling?
Though the beams of light are seperate, they are coming from the same source.
That is how it is similiar.
2007-02-20 22:16:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Adia Azrael 4
·
5⤊
2⤋
all religion is based on one god the only difference is hes name and how we worship him...interesting huh?
2007-02-20 22:16:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by dragontears 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
one thing is for sure in all of them god is one and only one,
2007-02-20 22:17:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋