English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i believe Americans killed their own people..
they gained more than muslims did..lol

2007-02-20 20:49:26 · 18 answers · asked by kittana! 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

18 answers

SORRY TO SAY BUT YOU ARE RIGHT AND WRONG MUSLIMS DID THE ACT OUR GOV LET THEM

2007-02-20 20:52:20 · answer #1 · answered by THE WAR WRENCH 4 · 3 5

1

2016-05-24 01:23:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

9/11 NOT DONE BY THE MUSLIMS BUT BUSH AND HIS TEAM PLANNED TO KILL THOUSAND OF INNOCENT PEOPLE INCLUDING THEIR OWN NATIONS (AMERICAN PEOPLE)...SEE BELOW PROOF.

9/11/2006 exposed (lies)
http://tvnewslies.org/html/where_the_hell_is_your_9_11_pr.html
9/11 conspiracy “theory” or is it reasonable suspicion based on evidence?
· Is it Really Crazy to Think That the Bush Administration are Involved in the Events of 9/11? Not If You Understood Their Beliefs & Agenda! It is About Time You Learned About The Bush Administration! - You have seen massive amounts of evidence debunking the official conspiracy theory of 9/11. You have seen tons of proof that the official story is a mountain of outright lies. However you still can not believe that your beloved president or his administration would do anything that bad to Americans. Well meet the neocons! Understand their philosophy and you will understand why you should suspect these people of being involved in the events of September 11th, 2001. - A MUST READ FOR ALL!
· TvNewsLIES Challenges Believers of the Official Version of 9/11: - Where the Hell is YOUR proof?
On the morning of September 11th, 2001, Dick Cheney was running several war games in the north eastern portion of the United States. These drills included many hijacking scenarios, where hijacked commercial jets were hijacked and flown into buildings. At the same time Cheney had arranged for a drill involving a bio attack on NY. This resulted in FEMA setting up a command post on pier 29 in New York on September 10th.
The war games involved live fly exercises, and electronic drills where fake blips were placed on radar screens. Cheney was in charge of a communications system that superseded those of the FAA, NORAD and NEADS. Some of the drills possibly included remote control planes.
Cheney was in a position to have the air defense agencies stand down

The common sense connection: these men lied in order to start a war and in the process they sacrificed the lives of over 2000 american soldiers. What makes you think that they did not sacrifice 3000 total strangers on 9/11/2001 for the same purpose? http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=181
With all the recent questions being asked about the lies that led us to war one question is still being ignored: what does 9/11 have to do with the US invasion of Iraq. The answer is not what you have been told; the illogical claim that 9/11 changed everything and it caused the US to change the way they dealt with potential threats. The real connection here is that 9/11 gave the men who wanted to invade Iraq so badly that they lied to the world in order to do it, the political and popular support to go ahead with their radical agenda.
9/11 exposed..........American are Big Liar....hypocrites..Their Politicians can kill their own innocent people for greeds....for their benefits

2007-02-20 21:03:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

This question is often hurled at Muslims, either directly or indirectly, during any discussion on religion or world affairs. Muslim stereotypes are perpetuated in every form of the media accompanied by gross misinformation about Islam and Muslims. In fact, such misinformation and false propaganda often leads to discrimination and acts of violence against Muslims. A case in point is the anti-Muslim campaign in the American media following the Oklahoma bomb blast, where the press was quick to declare a ‘Middle Eastern conspiracy’ behind the attack. The culprit was later identified as a soldier from the American Armed Forces.

Let us analyze this allegation of ‘fundamentalism’ and ‘terrorism’:

1. Definition of the word ‘fundamentalist’

A fundamentalist is a person who follows and adheres to the fundamentals of the doctrine or theory he is following. For a person to be a good doctor, he should know, follow, and practise the fundamentals of medicine. In other words, he should be a fundamentalist in the field of medicine. For a person to be a good mathematician, he should know, follow and practise the fundamentals of mathematics. He should be a fundamentalist in the field of mathematics. For a person to be a good scientist, he should know, follow and practise the fundamentals of science. He should be a fundamentalist in the field of science.

2. Not all ‘fundamentalists’ are the same

One cannot paint all fundamentalists with the same brush. One cannot categorize all fundamentalists as either good or bad. Such a categorization of any fund amentalist will depend upon the field or activity in which he is a fundamentalist. A fundamentalist robber or thief causes harm to society and is therefore undesirable. A fundamentalist doctor, on the other hand, benefits society and earns much respect.

3. I am proud to be a Muslim fundamentalist

I am a fundamentalist Muslim who, by the grace of Allah, knows, follows and strives to practise the fundamentals of Islam. A true Muslim does not shy away from being a fundamentalist. I am proud to be a fundamentalist Muslim because, I know that the fundamentals of Islam are beneficial to humanity and the whole world. There is not a single fundamental of Islam that causes harm or is against the interests of the human race as a whole. Many people harbour misconceptions about Islam and consider several teachings of Islam to be unfair or improper. This is due to insufficient and incorrect knowledge of Islam. If one critically analyzes the teachings of Islam with an open mind, one cannot escape the fact that Islam is full of benefits both at the individual and collective levels.

4. Dictionary meaning of the word ‘fundamentalist’

According to Webster’s dictionary ‘fundamentalism’ was a movement in American Protestanism that arose in the earlier part of the 20th century. It was a reaction to modernism, and stressed the infallibility of the Bible, not only in matters of faith and morals but also as a literal historical record. It stressed on belief in the Bible as the literal word of God. Thus fundamentalism was a word initially used for a group of Christians who believed that the Bible was the verbatim word of God without any errors and mistakes.

According to the Oxford dictionary ‘fundamentalism’ means ‘strict maintenance of ancient or fundamental doctrines of any religion, especially Islam’.

Today the moment a person uses the word fundamentalist he thinks of a Muslim who is a terrorist.

5. Every Muslim should be a terrorist

Every Muslim should be a terrorist. A terrorist is a person who causes terror. The moment a robber sees a policeman he is terrified. A policeman is a terrorist for the robber. Similarly every Muslim should be a terrorist for the antisocial elements of society, such as thieves, dacoits and rapists. Whenever such an anti-social element sees a Muslim, he should be terrified. It is true that the word ‘terrorist’ is generally used for a person who causes terror among the common people. But a true Muslim should only be a terrorist to selective people i.e. anti-social elements, and not to the common innocent people. In fact a Muslim should be a source of peace for innocent people.

6. Different labels given to the same individual for the same action, i.e. ‘terrorist’ and ‘patriot’

Before India achieved independence from British rule, some freedom fighters of India who did not subscribe to non-violence were labeled as terrorists by the British government. The same individuals have been lauded by Indians for the same activities and hailed as ‘patriots’. Thus two different labels have been given to the same people for the same set of actions. One is calling him a terrorist while the other is calling him a patriot. Those who believed that Britain had a right to rule over India called these people terrorists, while those who were of the view that Britain had no right to rule India called them patriots and freedom fighters.

It is therefore important that before a person is judged, he is given a fair hearing. Both sides of the argument to maintain and promote peace throughout the world.
should be heard, the situation should be analyzed, and the reason and the intention of the person should be taken into account, and then the person can be judged accordingly.

7. Islam means peace

Islam is derived from the word ‘salaam’ which means peace. It is a religion of peace whose fundamentals teach its followers
Thus every Muslim should be a fundamentalist i.e. he should follow the fundamentals of the Religion of Peace: Islam. He should be a terrorist only towards the antisocial elements in order to promote peace and justice in the society.

2007-02-20 21:24:25 · answer #4 · answered by PeaceKeeper 2 · 0 1

if that makes you feel better about your own faith and your own people, then keep on believing it...

3000 people that lost their lives to muslim extremists will be waiting to greet you when you die.

i think they are gonna be mad at you.

2007-02-20 21:21:35 · answer #5 · answered by j_mang 3 · 0 0

Some people say that they could not even read and write English properly...

God moves in mysterious ways!

2007-02-20 22:26:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yeah, because we breed a society of suicide bombers. Isn't that why so many people come here illegally? They love the freedom to blow things up at will.

2007-02-20 20:53:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Where do you get the idea American's did this to themselves? What did they have to gain? That is so ludicrous. There is proof that it was planned, and carried out by terrorists. Bin Laden admitted to it. He denied it at first like the coward he is, but was recorded later.

2007-02-20 20:52:37 · answer #8 · answered by TE 5 · 1 3

*That is a lie. Osama admitted to the attacks.Why would he take credit for something we did, when if we really did it to ourselves that would destroy us quicker than terrorists attacks. Terrorist attacks only unites us and makes us stronger.*

2007-02-20 21:04:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I guess Muslims feel they gain more in killing their own.. lol...
Neither what I wrote nor what you wrote was funny..

2007-02-20 20:53:56 · answer #10 · answered by XX 6 · 0 1

Nope, wrong.

It was those terrorist penguins from the south pole. They are the ones who destroyed the Twin Towers.

2007-02-20 20:53:10 · answer #11 · answered by Chief BaggageSmasher 7 · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers