English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

and the person following you was a undercover cop car? I thought it was some crazy person and was about to get into a physical confrontation with him if i stopped. He couldnt even pull me over without calling a squad car cause he had no sirans or lights. The squad cop told me she would take my side in court. Isnt that for the most part intrapment?

2007-02-20 20:38:11 · 4 answers · asked by superdubs 1 in Politics & Government Law Enforcement & Police

4 answers

The uniformed Officer told you she would take your side in court? Who wrote you the violations, her or the undercover? If the undercover wrote you the tickets and you got the name of the uniformed Officer, then contact her to make sure she was serious about testifying on your behalf. Then go to court and fight it.
If she is not willing to testify for you anymore (which is most likely the case) you can still try to fight the tickets, but it probably won't work. Violations are violations, no matter who is behind you. The judge will probably figure that if you felt you were in danger from the person following you, you should have pulled into a place with lots of people around or called the Police yourself.

2007-02-20 22:23:30 · answer #1 · answered by dh1977 7 · 2 0

I consistently like to pay attention human beings say how the police are doing this manner of great pastime....yet whilst that "great pastime" includes YOU, the completed state of affairs variations and the law enforcement officers are "screwed up", under no circumstances fails. risky using might, at cases, symbolize an infraction punishable by potential of a good; each in specific situations an arrest could be made for reckless using. in the journey that your using 40 seven in a 25 you will no longer be able to be arrest till this is shown as "reckless" a misdo crime; ninety 9% of the time you will get an trouble-free value ticket and pay a good for it; if youin case you hit a newborn, or absolutely everyone at 40 seven MPH enable me to help you comprehend the way it is going, under no circumstances techniques the great or your reformatory time...: the effect usualy breaks the two Femars, the widely used legs bones, in neck injuries are person-friendly whilst the effect whiplashes the backbone and severs the spinal twine, the pinnacle usualy impacts the hood through fact the physique folds forward and tossed some one hundred ft; no longer something ever works a similar after that... and additionally you will possibly be able to ***** relating to the police catching "actual criminals"? Your pissed on the grounds which you acquire caught, you need to care much less approximately absolutely everyone else yet your self and it for sure shows. A " actual criminal" migh be a economic corporation robber? ok, they take $25,000 and flee, a huge chase, they get caught....and the prevalent public see's it through fact the police saving the day... in fact, the 1st half-hour for the youngster in emergency room value properly over the $25000 the police "saved"...yet, the youngster remains a large number. you will possibly be able to desire to mature some and notice the international for what it fairly is. enable the police %. and choose what job they might desire to do as maximum are hard working with the publics pastime in techniques.

2016-10-16 04:00:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Sounds like a cop couple working together, and the husband was technically off-duty. If this was the case, it goes to show how the job becomes their life.

Oink, Rico.

2007-02-20 20:48:16 · answer #3 · answered by TarKettle 6 · 0 1

That explains why the wife offered to testify against the undercover, right?

Moron.

2007-02-20 21:02:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers