Hitler was elected. He was a popular ruler. He was up front and honest about his views of fascism and racial superiority. Germans supported him until the bombs started falling.
Those nations had slaughtered Jews before Hitler.....and many of them (Poland, Norway, Czeck, France, the Baltic States, Western Russia) made no efforts to save any of their populations.
Nations that wanted to save their Jewish populations laregely did (Bulgaria, Denmark).
Instead of focusing on Hitler, should we be focusing on the values, traditions, and attitudes of those societies?
2007-02-20
18:33:09
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
Slave of God seems sensitive to something. I wonder why she'd be worried about analyzing how the values of Christian societies lead to slaughtering people over the course of 1000's of years.
Could it be that the belief that only you are saved leads to the easy rationalization of barbaric behavior?
In the pit of her stomach...she doesn't want those cultures questioned because she knows the answers.
I'll tell you who the hell I am to question....I'm someone who has no extended family because of those societies. I think that gives me the right to ask how it happened.
You are why it's time to move past blaming Hitler. It's easy for people like you to blame the bad man. It's harder to ask how the bad man was able to do it.
It wasn't all hypnotism. People WANTED to do those things.
You are an intellectual coward.
2007-02-21
02:17:20 ·
update #1
Just a side point....until you learn the correct usage of basic words like "your", don't call someone else unintelligent.
Your countries are more peaceful because they have no militaries left. Give me a break.
2007-02-21
02:24:55 ·
update #2