why is Chalcedon's formulation with regard the true divinity and true humanity of Jesus Christ not a finished

Question

why is Chalcedon's formulation with regard the true divinity and true humanity of Jesus Christ not a finished answer?

Answer 1

To answer your queston, here is the Chalcedon Definition or Creed (in English):

Following, then, the holy fathers, we unite in teaching all men to confess the one and only Son, our Lord Jesus Christ. This selfsame one is perfect both in deity and in humanness; this selfsame one is also actually God and actually man, with a rational soul [meaning human soul] and a body. He is of the same reality as God as far as his deity is concerned and of the same reality as we ourselves as far as his humanness is concerned; thus like us in all respects, sin only excepted. Before time began he was begotten of the Father, in respect of his deity, and now in these "last days," for us and behalf of our salvation, this selfsame one was born of Mary the virgin, who is God-bearer in respect of his humanness.
We also teach that we apprehend this one and only Christ-Son, Lord, only-begotten -- in two natures; and we do this without confusing the two natures, without transmuting one nature into the other, without dividing them into two separate categories, without contrasting them according to area or function. The distinctiveness of each nature is not nullified by the union. Instead, the "properties" of each nature are conserved and both natures concur in one "person" and in one reality [hypostasis]. They are not divided or cut into two persons, but are together the one and only and only-begotten Word [Logos] of God, the Lord Jesus Christ. Thus have the prophets of old testified; thus the Lord Jesus Christ himself taught us; thus the Symbol of Fathers [the Nicene Creed] has handed down to us.


That's pretty complete, don't you think? The Chalcedon Definition is the faith of the Church (all branches - Protestant/ Evangelical, Roman Cathoic, and Orthodox) concerning the Person, Deity and Nature of Christ.

Hope this helps. :)

I was soooo happy to see your question - there are too many here who waste space posting spurious idiotic "questions" meant to only to offend

Answer 2

No, you should settle for Him by means of fact the Son of God, meaning that he's God in flesh. look at this passage: Luke 23:40-40 3 however the different, answering, rebuked him, asserting, "Do you no longer even worry God, seeing you're under the comparable condemnation? John 5:18 states: 18For this reason the Jews attempted all of the extra durable to kill him; no longer merely became he breaking the Sabbath, yet he became even calling God his very own Father, making himself equivalent with God. it incredibly is sparkling that the early followers of Christ believed that Christ became God in flesh or no less than in some why shape or form a hundred% equivalent with God. whether you look at Christ being nailed on a go. This became a curse to Jewish people and that they've been to grant their existence for yet another Jew - yet yet they of course gave Him over - Why? by means of fact it became lawful to convict to death on the go guy or woman who claimed to be God. that's why that they had no difficulty with it. Even Peter's Church , which we nevertheless be attentive to the area has imprinted on the partitions the worshipof Christ as God or Diety. So no, you could not settle for Christ without incredibly accepting who he's, and that's God in flesh. we live in an age the place we've not any difficulty re-defining christianity and what it potential to be christian, yet neither the way nor the Diety of Christ has replaced. and that's even with denomination nor age.

Answer 3

I thought it was. It is the official confession accepted by the Roman Catholic, Orthodox, Anglican, Presbyterian, and Methodist Churches.