If not... WHY?
Oh, and keep in mind - over 95% of scientists accept it (i.e., it's not really being debated) and it's a NON-random process, and it's not abiogenesis or the Big Bang theory.
2007-02-20 18:04:28 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I just use the word "believe" to making it easier on the theists.
2007-02-20 18:08:54 · update #1
Are the disbelievers of Evolution afraid to answer this since I gave them limitations - like, NOT believing in misconceptions?
2007-02-20 18:14:14 · update #2
I accept it. There's no need to "believe" in something that's already been shown to be fact.
2007-02-20 18:07:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm a "theist" as you so gallantly put it, and yes, I'm educated and "believe" in evolution. (which doesn't Have to be Capitalized, does it?), and as far as I'm concerned, shows the care and foresight that my God and your God put into creation. To believe in less is to live your life hearing the bass notes of a beautiful orchestration, but never hearing the melody.
2007-02-21 02:14:27 · answer #2 · answered by Shinigami 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yep, but I don't think you wanted to hear from me. I would fall into that 95% of scientists population.
2007-02-21 02:10:04 · answer #3 · answered by Huggles-the-wise 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AsklZsZjOaS1QmWrQ3IQ2qDsy6IX?qid=20070220222934AAys540
Yes, I understand what agnosticism is, but they (agnostics) have taken a turn and bastardized the meaning of agnosticism to a fence sitter between theism and atheism.
2007-02-21 06:20:57 · answer #4 · answered by Alucard 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋